Re: [icnrg] progressing draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios

Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu> Wed, 27 August 2014 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EB91A0ADC for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BEHXi4jNPJJG for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF9D1A0AD8 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF52107D17; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:00:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3MBXvr08_enF; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F34107D16; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:00:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.182]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:00:37 +0200
From: Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>
To: Kostas Pentikousis <k.pentikousis@eict.de>
Thread-Topic: [icnrg] progressing draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios
Thread-Index: Ac+yQK9ptI7MNkZBT8uFinzr2gskKwAqdFiAA8dE27A=
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:00:35 +0000
Message-ID: <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F524991BA14D2@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F524991B61E61@PALLENE.office.hd> <0C7EDCF89AB9E2478B5D010026CFF4AEA10C61A87D@SBS2008.eict.local>
In-Reply-To: <0C7EDCF89AB9E2478B5D010026CFF4AEA10C61A87D@SBS2008.eict.local>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.2.204]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/6b9HMd-sYVA9zTZID8I6f6thobM
Cc: "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] progressing draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:00:44 -0000

Thanks Kostas and all!

I have initiated the IRSG review for this one now.

Best regards,
Dirk

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kostas Pentikousis [mailto:k.pentikousis@eict.de]
> Sent: Freitag, 8. August 2014 13:24
> To: Dirk Kutscher
> Cc: icnrg@irtf.org
> Subject: Re: [icnrg] progressing draft-irtf-icnrg-scenarios
> 
> Dear Dirk, all,
> 
> | I would like to progress publication of the scenarios draft.
> 
> Thank you very much for the go ahead Dirk.
> 
> |
> | In order to do that, I would like to ask for the following changes in
> | the document:
> |
> | - abstract: mention that this is an ICNRG product
> 
> Done.
> 
> | - introduction: add paragraph describing the level of support for
> | publication of the document, i.e., something like  "this document
> | represents the consensus of the ICN RG"
> | - somewhere at beginning: describe breadth of review the draft has
> | received
> |
> | See https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/IRTF-RFCs for
> | details.
> 
> I also had a look at a few recent IRTF Stream RFCs in order to make sure
> we're in line with earlier publications.
> 
> The document is now updated: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-
> icnrg-scenarios/.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Kostas