Re: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC

[Phil Hunt <[e-mail]>]

It might be time to look at current popular streaming systems such as Kafka. If the group wants to write a new spec, then identify what problem is to be solved that hasn’t already been addressed in the market.

Phil Hunt | Cloud Security and Identity Architect
Oracle Corporation, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
@independentid
www.independentid.com
[e-mail]






> On Feb 25, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> The latter: the working group is dropping HTTP Push as a topic.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Yaron
> 
> On 25/02/2019 21:08, Richard Backman, Annabelle wrote:
>> Yaron,
>> Forgive my unfamiliarity with IETF process, but could you explain what this decision by the chairs means? Does this mean the document will not be advanced along the standards track, but will remain as a WG draft? Or does this mean the secevent WG is effectively dropping HTTP push delivery as a topic that it is working on?
>> -- 
>> Annabelle Richard Backman
>> AWS Identity
>> *From: *Id-event <[e-mail]> on behalf of Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>
>> *Date: *Sunday, February 17, 2019 at 6:43 AM
>> *To: *SecEvent <[e-mail]>
>> *Subject: *[Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC
>> Dear working group,
>> We issued a 2-week second last call for draft-ietf-secevent-http-push-04 on Jan. 24, and extended it by a further week, which expired on Friday. We had to issue a second last call because of lack of response to the first last call which took place in November/December.
>> The results were better in the second try (2 non-authors in support, and 1 not clearly supporting publication) but not enough in our mind to push the document forward.
>> This means that we will not be publishing the Push protocol as a working group document. The authors are welcome to publish it through other channels, as an AD-sposored RFC or through the ISE.
>> We regret that we have reached this impasse, but clearly there is too little energy within the working group. We thank the authors for the significant effort that they put into this document, and thank the working group members who reviewed it.
>> Regards,
>>     Dick and Yaron
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Id-event mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_id-2Devent&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=na5FVzBTWmanqWNy4DpctyXPpuYqPkAI1aLcLN4KZNA&m=IhopAP-6tWoTdeVj-i6_kC7N053G_eaQJ7OEZGpoNmc&s=Nu5StUuDomBOpZIwbF7bpUS3djwgeBfySnVPbWZdNdE&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_id-2Devent&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=na5FVzBTWmanqWNy4DpctyXPpuYqPkAI1aLcLN4KZNA&m=IhopAP-6tWoTdeVj-i6_kC7N053G_eaQJ7OEZGpoNmc&s=Nu5StUuDomBOpZIwbF7bpUS3djwgeBfySnVPbWZdNdE&e=>