Re: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC

[Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>]

The latter: the working group is dropping HTTP Push as a topic.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 25/02/2019 21:08, Richard Backman, Annabelle wrote:
> Yaron,
> 
> Forgive my unfamiliarity with IETF process, but could you explain what 
> this decision by the chairs means? Does this mean the document will not 
> be advanced along the standards track, but will remain as a WG draft? Or 
> does this mean the secevent WG is effectively dropping HTTP push 
> delivery as a topic that it is working on?
> 
> -- 
> 
> Annabelle Richard Backman
> 
> AWS Identity
> 
> *From: *Id-event <[e-mail]> on behalf of Yaron Sheffer 
> <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Sunday, February 17, 2019 at 6:43 AM
> *To: *SecEvent <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC
> 
> Dear working group,
> 
> We issued a 2-week second last call for draft-ietf-secevent-http-push-04 
> on Jan. 24, and extended it by a further week, which expired on Friday. 
> We had to issue a second last call because of lack of response to the 
> first last call which took place in November/December.
> 
> The results were better in the second try (2 non-authors in support, and 
> 1 not clearly supporting publication) but not enough in our mind to push 
> the document forward.
> 
> This means that we will not be publishing the Push protocol as a working 
> group document. The authors are welcome to publish it through other 
> channels, as an AD-sposored RFC or through the ISE.
> 
> We regret that we have reached this impasse, but clearly there is too 
> little energy within the working group. We thank the authors for the 
> significant effort that they put into this document, and thank the 
> working group members who reviewed it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>      Dick and Yaron
>