Re: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC

"Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna@amazon.com> Mon, 25 February 2019 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=9529fe1d5=richanna@amazon.com>
X-Original-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5968130F49 for <id-event@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:08:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NhupprZndi_o for <id-event@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:08:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fw-33001.amazon.com (smtp-fw-33001.amazon.com [207.171.190.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC1A12426A for <id-event@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:08:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1551121726; x=1582657726; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=1zkuXZ4vkPB890NINP22V/+gaMhmNP7UpEpDNKmZRds=; b=fD+rQQ3+DhaiVvFWoAyPrL3vZAUmAp4nqJ8xzWhSZjEP87Mv+ukumToC cvXMf4T56EyO3tTxvN5bYU+b4n18pZPlqbblaZonCLMZyrdeWcqRahxdI 6aPR+dfDjnQXCmp61sjogEKvEwANpVZgRni4Qnap6tJiwK7sEv8wtGn9h k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,412,1544486400"; d="scan'208,217";a="785022260"
Received: from sea3-co-svc-lb6-vlan2.sea.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-2a-53356bf6.us-west-2.amazon.com) ([10.47.22.34]) by smtp-border-fw-out-33001.sea14.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 25 Feb 2019 19:08:15 +0000
Received: from EX13MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (pdx1-ws-svc-p6-lb9-vlan3.pdx.amazon.com [10.236.137.198]) by email-inbound-relay-2a-53356bf6.us-west-2.amazon.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x1PJ8FxH000621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:08:15 GMT
Received: from EX13D11UWC004.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.101) by EX13MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:08:14 +0000
Received: from EX13D11UWC004.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.101) by EX13D11UWC004.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:08:14 +0000
Received: from EX13D11UWC004.ant.amazon.com ([10.43.162.101]) by EX13D11UWC004.ant.amazon.com ([10.43.162.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:08:14 +0000
From: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna@amazon.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, SecEvent <id-event@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHUxs8uWogjiQMHU0OrBSibnYCS6qXwZy6A
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:08:14 +0000
Message-ID: <05D942B6-1F1C-4205-B0E9-5AF6B37D551B@amazon.com>
References: <7cfedb70-a999-ad63-efd0-56a178adde97@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7cfedb70-a999-ad63-efd0-56a178adde97@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.0.180812
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.43.160.230]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_05D942B61F1C4205B0E95AF6B37D551Bamazoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: Bulk
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/id-event/CleLRq55WQRdm1kGDM8ax2llFOQ>
Subject: Re: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC
X-BeenThere: id-event@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "A mailing list to discuss the potential solution for a common identity event messaging format and distribution system." <id-event.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/id-event/>
List-Post: <mailto:id-event@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:08:49 -0000

Yaron,

Forgive my unfamiliarity with IETF process, but could you explain what this decision by the chairs means? Does this mean the document will not be advanced along the standards track, but will remain as a WG draft? Or does this mean the secevent WG is effectively dropping HTTP push delivery as a topic that it is working on?

--
Annabelle Richard Backman
AWS Identity


From: Id-event <id-event-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, February 17, 2019 at 6:43 AM
To: SecEvent <id-event@ietf.org>
Subject: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC

Dear working group,

We issued a 2-week second last call for draft-ietf-secevent-http-push-04 on Jan. 24, and extended it by a further week, which expired on Friday. We had to issue a second last call because of lack of response to the first last call which took place in November/December.

The results were better in the second try (2 non-authors in support, and 1 not clearly supporting publication) but not enough in our mind to push the document forward.

This means that we will not be publishing the Push protocol as a working group document. The authors are welcome to publish it through other channels, as an AD-sposored RFC or through the ISE.

We regret that we have reached this impasse, but clearly there is too little energy within the working group. We thank the authors for the significant effort that they put into this document, and thank the working group members who reviewed it.

Regards,

    Dick and Yaron