Re: [Id-event] [E] Re: Closing the SecEvent working group

[Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>]

Sorry folks. We decided that this draft does not have WG support back in August, because it clearly did not have such support. Yes there are obviously people who want to see it published as an RFC. But not enough for any meaningful discussion during the WG last call (or even a positive response before the WGLC expired, we had exactly one). Nor any discussion since then. Nor a new draft version published since late July 2019.

 

Let me remind the group that the IETF offers two alternatives for publication, either AD-sponsored or through the ISE.

 

Thanks,

                Yaron

 

From: Bjorn Hjelm <[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, July 3, 2020 at 05:29
To: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna=[e-mail]>
Cc: Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [E] Re: [Id-event] Closing the SecEvent working group

 

Annabelle,

I would like to see this work being completed.

BR,

Bjorn




On Jul 2, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Richard Backman, Annabelle <richanna=[e-mail]> wrote:

 

I’d like to hear from the working group on whether or not there is interest in completing the Subject Identifiers draft  within secevents. This work has more or less been put on hiatus given the chairs’ previous decision not to continue with it within the working group, but it remains a dependency for other work, and a number of people within the working group have expressed interest and support for it previously. If there is support within the working group for resuming and completing Subject Identifiers, then it would seem reasonable to me to do so within secevents.

 

–

Annabelle Backman (she/her)

AWS Identity

https://aws.amazon.com/identity/

 

 

From: Id-event <[e-mail]> on behalf of Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 2:06 AM
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Id-event] Closing the SecEvent working group

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Dear WG participants,

 

As you’ve all seen, our last two deliverables, the SET HTTP delivery specs, have both been approved for publication as RFCs.

 

Since the group has now completed its mission, we propose to close it down. Unless there are objections (accompanied by credible work items) within a week, we will ask the AD to do just that. Even with the WG shut down, the mailing list will remain open for relevant discussions.

 

We would like to thank the authors of the Push and Poll soon-to-be RFCs, Annabelle, Mike, Marius, Morteza and Anthony. Many thanks also to the many other working group members who contributed to these quality documents.

 

Regards,

 

                Dick and Yaron

_______________________________________________
Id-event mailing list
[e-mail]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_id-2Devent&d=DwICAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=NMZJHCV8pjvGIH2fTx9z6l7g7-V-a2xW7ISf9uHdz0A&m=JdLD0MPKiH-cnYaRWq00dc9RaqFuwKAR2s9Y6qctmCY&s=ruzxNhwgDEh8N2N1ayOzTrCx8t1W3gLrz39-Jny_mhc&e=