Re: [Id-event] Closing the SecEvent working group

[Mike Jones <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for raising this point, Annabelle.

I support finishing https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-secevent-subject-identifiers in this working group.  It’s an important specification and the right people to provide actionable reviews are already in this working group.  If this moves elsewhere, it won’t get the same level of expert review that it will here.

I’ll also note that at least seven people responded positively to the WGLC and none opposed.

I agree that it’s time to finish this work.

                                                          -- Mike

From: Id-event <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Richard Backman, Annabelle
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 4:00 PM
To: Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Id-event] Closing the SecEvent working group

I’d like to hear from the working group on whether or not there is interest in completing the Subject Identifiers draft  within secevents. This work has more or less been put on hiatus given the chairs’ previous decision not to continue with it within the working group, but it remains a dependency for other work, and a number of people within the working group have expressed interest and support for it previously. If there is support within the working group for resuming and completing Subject Identifiers, then it would seem reasonable to me to do so within secevents.

–
Annabelle Backman (she/her)
AWS Identity
https://aws.amazon.com/identity/


From: Id-event <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 2:06 AM
To: "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Id-event] Closing the SecEvent working group


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear WG participants,

As you’ve all seen, our last two deliverables, the SET HTTP delivery specs, have both been approved for publication as RFCs.

Since the group has now completed its mission, we propose to close it down. Unless there are objections (accompanied by credible work items) within a week, we will ask the AD to do just that. Even with the WG shut down, the mailing list will remain open for relevant discussions.

We would like to thank the authors of the Push and Poll soon-to-be RFCs, Annabelle, Mike, Marius, Morteza and Anthony. Many thanks also to the many other working group members who contributed to these quality documents.

Regards,

                Dick and Yaron