Re: [Idnet] IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management: Follow-up

[yanshen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jerome,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jérôme François [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:26 PM
> To: yanshen <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Idnet] IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management:
> Follow-up
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Le 21/07/2017 à 09:32, yanshen a écrit :
> > - the immediate plan is to organize a regular workshop (probably
> > within NMRG). I fully support the idea as this helps to federate the
> > community first to ambition then coordinated actions (regarding the
> > issues with datasets for example). But recall that that will be
> > workshop within a RG group and it is probably too early to identify
> > what should be standardized  (or look at a WG in that case). Looking
> > at the experience with flow measurement workshop (within NMRG as
> > well), it should be more open for presentations and discussions and if a
> potential standard is identified, this can be targeted afterwards.
> > I support the regular workshop (whatever in any form). I fully understand your
> worried about the "too early". However, I think it is better to find a common or
> say a potential standardized point to concentrate the focus. After that, we can
> expand our focus to other valuable area. A details point may help us to clear up
> the thought, during which we may evolve a clear methodology for the future
> work. Of course I totally agree with your open attitude. I mean only to
> concentrate the topic firstly.
> >
> >
> So, why not targeting a WG (rather than a RG because in my understanding
> primary focus of RG is not standardization) ?

I am troubled in finding a satisfied WG. Any suggestion? For example, in measurement area.

Thanks for your reply.

Regards,

Yansen

> 
> 
> best regards,
> jerome