IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024)

Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com> Sat, 23 March 2024 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87C1C14F5FB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ft4L5Pikf-I for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from diehard.n-r-g.com (diehard.n-r-g.com [62.48.3.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF5EC14F5EE for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22065 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Mar 2024 13:24:59 -0000
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:24:59 +0100
From: Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <Zf7YKxXJCP8QnAVa@diehard.n-r-g.com>
References: <DM6PR08MB48574BAABAAC203EA2F9F139B3312@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR08MB48574BAABAAC203EA2F9F139B3312@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-HXgFbdHr9unWdZdLuqnkQCfFYs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:25:08 -0000

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:53:51AM +0000, Susan Hares wrote:
> This begins a 3-week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer (3/23/2024 to 4/12/2024).
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer/
> 
> The authors should reply to this message indicating if they know of any IPR relating to this draft.
> 
> This draft modifies RFC4271's finite state machine.  Please review it carefully.
> 
> Cheerily, Susan Hares

As one of the developers that implemented this in OpenBGPD I'm in full
support of this draft. The changes to the BGP FSM are minimal, well
contained and clearly formulated.

Cheers
-- 
:wq Claudio

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email