IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024)

joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3A1C15198F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id daVKkBT7HZix for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98E8DC14F60B for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d48d75ab70so69170661fa.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712629293; x=1713234093; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R5TQCHcRq4sQg4jWyvCgWYdI7uWmK52LEjaAoYTTXks=; b=ft5xSEfnVPqZfmufoZyVFH29uU5Uv6GcYOZnwy8Hksjh+lOLUwxwz03/d4vOYp4EFn xz14hJVRpo7dcG7uhKSIKHClu8qS7k5jdR0vStuFnmqQ8MDwEspbbNYNsLO6fGylQz/V k9KMY+IOWCKjslUnuuAKaajg4Fuj0znQEy1hSZ6J3TrlaXkT4Id6gsOBIsY0GnhcnAzj 2PujeAPzf9+a0J+WO87rWnxlkjz5tuqVFVt7YYQM5qNLBlkB/wYSHCrTpDPnzslwvupF kRUYVdq2h8d2sHGZKn3WwKlrh05px4JrRRXKsSEan/iCncb43fIuuP97MnhzL1QYqQ1q 00Yg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712629293; x=1713234093; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R5TQCHcRq4sQg4jWyvCgWYdI7uWmK52LEjaAoYTTXks=; b=OZSWeVSHWqw2HMPODA9U8EPXTTb1Az5VC/Up57IvFQQzqNQ60PWimKkVTF9MGm9Trt zwuQcAnhWlifHh827oeuoQE4AQZ2ZUs0TbeX95J+e+IV8aMYvwtvuBQzuwA0vj6+76EM mIJ9HIWwd1vv1IOtK45X7xXISwH9Ur8BN7U9GXA16e3pXYfNgXXlyuDsmYJLlZYCFN40 oRRTkJo15KQ8WZTTDThpOgbgyTc+5Okv1F5/JhRjFuo4XbDVU278sTQa/QFJNWUaAQs0 l4GGYJXxPDJ3VTE7lnU5GmD6C+fqWAOTrTf0f3y+mBiXHFX7Exkjp+9VXyVtsjVrtr2F 5P4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxK//gwGKTCky1EN+/gwhAHWwp1hIOzz7KDDPS8WpcE9oeMPJl/ UCbgZEqcipzeFKhXOWt3WFl7V8IRgORmeHTe1w7defDEn69RImTPUw+u0NQMHeQ9scMrJGRFAfC I33wVnj/7gjS2Qeu+Wj6pgL8Juh+2qhI91S8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE6MgL5ySswueDDflITscDtkC47xvLeecmykudvE4tyYFcIYFnVa5PKX7oOaHhPN7V577HyIUqy7F5UrvzFRVY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1251:b0:2d8:7363:ff36 with SMTP id h17-20020a05651c125100b002d87363ff36mr5253335ljh.37.1712629292767; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:20:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA8XPEH3OOLFA3LWv5znP1C+XNxiD5G+821rE+OFkuvQkLeJ=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a0a30a0615a0945d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/NMXUZyPsuY12mQCpfzetnLIF288>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-03 (3/23 to 4/12/2024)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 02:21:39 -0000

I support the advancement out of the working group for:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer/

this addresses and adds significant clarity to situations that routinely
cause significant observable impact between peering sessions on the
internet.  while stacks have significant variability  in how they handle
errors i think this is a significant improvement in baseline expectations,
an is observably useful in circumstances where other mitigitions like say
BFD might not be appropriate or effective because they are uncoupled
services or are not readily usable between peers.

Thanks
joel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email