Re: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6

Stefano Gargiulo <rastrano@gmail.com> Thu, 29 July 2010 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rastrano@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6F13A67A4; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xnuLhH3z84+x; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C573A680A; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so138219eyb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type; bh=gYM1WGnBpJdVV9iYfmMTcBaxtLJEtit0ERLLNP4+7yo=; b=l+pH7jTwi061o2sG4rHtlgi4WT7xpXqw1ZbweXCdSLKYsgTofZV8VqwX3g4plG8p+R IlKxc5C0f6d09FQYA481nARGXPN68t1R+lbGXu/yRbrIgpgue/lzC6aieCGjdizkr1ix Auk8RnlzU/8VqrPFY+lpbZBQjTLCBA6NQrLXY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; b=e3OuyIfv2eiFOAX80wuXOwfQ+eUzEe6Ls3R0RCWP4hTNHxYIezM0e+r7u8UStu/u/D XXm9TyqTAosg3GCtVt88t6G2EQODLtj5+ymx6utIlFyxL5YTM3l7WNxaMkSWsII6Gygv IyfG2PhsrnJJFMjbxBmz7xKenmuiePLg68+SI=
Received: by 10.227.146.4 with SMTP id f4mr233612wbv.14.1280413509233; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [193.206.158.194] (pcgarr66.dir.garr.it [193.206.158.194]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i25sm781472wbi.22.2010.07.29.07.25.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C518F28.8040007@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:24:40 +0200
From: Stefano Gargiulo <rastrano@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; it; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kalpesh Zinjuwadia <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com>
References: <4C507959.10301@gmail.com> <D5D07AB53D722442AB59544CFF470EA41B3DB5629B@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5D07AB53D722442AB59544CFF470EA41B3DB5629B@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050802030301010209010603"
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "ietfmibs@ietf.org" <ietfmibs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:24:52 -0000

  Thank you so much Kalpesh.

Best regards,
Stefano.

Il 28/07/2010 21:27, Kalpesh Zinjuwadia ha scritto:
>
> There is an ID for BGP4 MIBv2 which supports IPv6 AF (IPv6 peers, 
> NLRIs, etc). Not a public MIB yet. Check the vendor's MIB specs to 
> find out if it's supported and the enterprise-specific root OID.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-10
>
> Force10 supports it under FORCE10-BGP4-V2-MIB
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kalpesh
>
> *From:* idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf 
> Of *Stefano Gargiulo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:39 AM
> *To:* ietfmibs@ietf.org; idr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6
>
> Hi, i'm sorry if this is not the right place to ask this, but i'm tring:
>
> Is there some proposal pending for implementing a *standard* bgp4 MIB 
> with full support for Ipv6?
>
> Time is coming: in 2011/12 ipv4 will end all allocable space as you know.
>
> But my question is more pratical:
> How to monitoring ipv6 bgp peers? anyone does that now? how?
>
> I need to start from now, so i hope that a standard will come up 
> soon... but for now i ask are there enterprise MIBs to do that on 
> Juniper and Cisco routers? anyone knows the root OIDs?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Best regards,
> Stefano.
>