IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6

Kalpesh Zinjuwadia <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com> Wed, 28 July 2010 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com>
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D65428B797; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rlah0KGDom4A; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.force10networks.com (corp.force10networks.com [64.186.164.204]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709983A68D3; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com ([10.11.10.113]) by exch7-sjc-fe.force10networks.com ([10.11.0.87]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:27:21 -0700
From: Kalpesh Zinjuwadia <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com>
To: Stefano Gargiulo <rastrano@gmail.com>, "ietfmibs@ietf.org" <ietfmibs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:27:18 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6
Thread-Index: AcsuhNaJpE+wPdCHRr2wjddipaug1wABSm3w
Message-ID: <D5D07AB53D722442AB59544CFF470EA41B3DB5629B@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com>
References: <4C507959.10301@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C507959.10301@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D5D07AB53D722442AB59544CFF470EA41B3DB5629BEXCHCLUSTER09_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:27:02 -0000

There is an ID for BGP4 MIBv2 which supports IPv6 AF (IPv6 peers, NLRIs, etc). Not a public MIB yet. Check the vendor's MIB specs to find out if it's supported and the enterprise-specific root OID.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-10

Force10 supports it under FORCE10-BGP4-V2-MIB

Thanks,
Kalpesh


From: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Gargiulo
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:39 AM
To: ietfmibs@ietf.org; idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6

Hi, i'm sorry if this is not the right place to ask this, but i'm tring:

Is there some proposal pending for implementing a standard bgp4 MIB with full support for Ipv6?

Time is coming: in 2011/12 ipv4 will end all allocable space as you know.

But my question is more pratical:
How to monitoring ipv6 bgp peers? anyone does that now? how?

I need to start from now, so i hope that a standard will come up soon... but for now i ask are there enterprise MIBs to do that on Juniper and Cisco routers? anyone knows the root OIDs?

Thank you in advance,
Best regards,
Stefano.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email