Re: [Idr] [IETFMIBS] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6
Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch> Fri, 30 July 2010 12:28 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=0827c1288d=simon.leinen@switch.ch>
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757B03A693E; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15L2rnxxTlry; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from caval.switch.ch (caval.switch.ch [IPv6:2001:620:0:14::29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518B13A6967; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:620:0:4:226:8ff:fe05:cfee] (helo=macsl.switch.ch) by caval.switch.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <simon.leinen@switch.ch>) id 1OeoiG-0005Jj-Dv; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:29:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <19538.50591.526381.713863@macsl.switch.ch>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:29:19 +0200
From: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
To: Kalpesh Zinjuwadia <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5D07AB53D722442AB59544CFF470EA41B3DB5629B@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com>
References: <4C507959.10301@gmail.com> <D5D07AB53D722442AB59544CFF470EA41B3DB5629B@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com>
X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0-devo-614 under 23.2.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0)
X-SWITCH-SCANNER: bypassed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:54:52 -0700
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "ietfmibs@ietf.org" <ietfmibs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [IETFMIBS] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:28:58 -0000
> There is an ID for BGP4 MIBv2 which supports IPv6 AF (IPv6 peers, > NLRIs, etc). Not a public MIB yet. Check the vendor's MIB specs to > find out if it's supported and the enterprise-specific root OID. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-10 This is an extremely important MIB to get standardized. As the original poster had said, how are we operators supposed to monitor IPv6 BGP peerings without something like this? The I-D has been active (growing and shrinking) over at least nine years: draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-00 is from July 2001. Since I cannot currently follow the IDR WG, I don't know what's holding it up right now. Maybe just general loss of energy/shifting of priorities, which are unavoidable over such a long time. But pushing this towards RFC (at whatever standards level) would be a very honorable and worthwhile thing to do. > Force10 supports it under FORCE10-BGP4-V2-MIB Thanks, that's great to know. Force 10 just moved up two notches on my personal vendor sympathy scale. Of course your feedback (and that of users on the operator side, if any) would be very useful for advancing this in IDR. -- Simon.
- [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6 Stefano Gargiulo
- Re: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6 Kalpesh Zinjuwadia
- Re: [Idr] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6 Stefano Gargiulo
- Re: [Idr] [IETFMIBS] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6 Simon Leinen
- Re: [Idr] [IETFMIBS] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6 sowmini.varadhan
- Re: [Idr] [IETFMIBS] SNMP bgpPeerTable IPV6 Jeffrey Haas