IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Tue, 23 October 2018 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D9130E03; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <PA2L2KW7cNbj>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char E2 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...\n\tout about the interim) \342\200\246 Yes, I would[...]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PA2L2KW7cNbj; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hated.at (mail.hated.at [IPv6:2001:858:2:8::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A7A130E94; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 213-225-12-195.nat.highway.a1.net ([213.225.12.195] helo=[192.168.43.10]) by mail.hated.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1gEqdo-0006QM-VN; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:58:13 +0200
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <BFD4172A-A6D2-4FD2-AF61-A12A0A5216DA@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9001EB05-5ECE-42EA-AABB-6F49142F9DBC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:58:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C2B8912B@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
References: <20180712185855.GQ12853@pfrc.org> <46D2DE8D-F552-444B-82C8-46DF301B1D10@tix.at> <20181004162737.GD17157@pfrc.org> <06EA9BDF-14C4-494B-AB5C-8C5264A10317@tix.at> <BA4ED40A-CD5D-4766-8610-61BF90345A8E@tix.at> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C2B8912B@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3E7uYwpaPIfo3sZl2xYL2vfqjeM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:58:33 -0000

Hi Jie,

I am sorry that my initial mail the other day did not reach you (I sent it to Sue and John - according to the mail Sue sent out about the interim) … Yes, I would like to present on the 5557-bis draft:

In order to progress the draft, I would like to present roughly 10 minutes on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-09 and two possible changes in the proposed behaviour that may need some more discussion on the working group:

	a) 

A property already in RFC 5575 that seemingly was ignored by pretty much all the implemenations “BGP opaque - NLRI)  

	b)

Less restrictive interaction of interfering flow actions.


Thanks for asking!

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 23.10.2018, at 04:28, Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Christoph,
>  
> We are building the agenda for the upcoming interim meeting.
>  
> Could you let us know whether you need a time slot in the interim to present the update on 5575-bis and discuss the remained issues?
>  
> Best regards,
> Jie
>  
> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Loibl
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 4:37 PM
> To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis
>  
> Hi,
>  
> On 05.10.2018, at 11:11, Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at <mailto:c@tix.at>> wrote:
>  
> I will upload a new version repairing the minor issues you pointed out (see the previous Email in this thread -  if I see no objections on the list). At the same time I am not changing any of the other aspects (discussed in this Email) until we have a rough idea where we are heading for.
>  
> As promised, I uploaded a new version of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis (-09) that addresses most of the minor issues pointed out by Jeffery in a way posted on the list earlier. Issues that seem to need more discussions have not been addressed by this new version (I may make a short presentation on that in the interim next week).
>  
> Please look into the changes on datatracker:
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/>
>  
> Cheers Christoph
>  
> -- 
> Christoph Loibl
> c@tix.at <mailto:c@tix.at> | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at <http://www.nextlayer.at/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email