Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt (9/2 to 9/17/2019)

"Enke Chen (enkechen)" <enkechen@cisco.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <enkechen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93183120271 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=clSbI+I+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=ptDoIp9J
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sW7wluYoPoGs for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D7481201EA for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7637; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1568049477; x=1569259077; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ntvF19WDHulv8IK12t+exL3tjtgPHqilZaO/jnmMV4c=; b=clSbI+I+YcVoP5EMLpUPzV+GZZ1UuC3jqPOAOBEUaIAyBQO7dLI6Yq7g 6BVefDMQQHEuV8FjXkvIij7ZCKqBiPwqpyvBLYovQF5P1oxUbIwd9HHij ysHhsUALcZBtuvqsE9mnI+8dmspKnGjeNjPVMW+BjWfdnd3Rx5DdVelbC M=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ATCbwxxWLBHCAJIytVNs3Y6tsijPV8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSA9yJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTF?= =?us-ascii?q?dE7KdehAk8GIiAAEz/IuTtank3GsdPX19o+VmwMFNeH4D1YFiB6nA=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DmAAB2iHZd/5FdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBZ4EWL1ADbVYgBAsqhCGDRwOKeII3JZMUhFyBQoEQA1QJAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BDAEBIwoCAQGEPwIXgiEjOBMCAwkBAQQBAQECAQYEbYUuDIVKAQEBAQMSCwY?= =?us-ascii?q?dAQE3AQ8CAQgOAwMBAisCAgIwHQgBAQQBDQUigwABgR1NAx0BDpoOAoE4iGF?= =?us-ascii?q?zgTKCfQEBBYFGQYMLGIIWAwaBNIt4GIFAP4E4DBOCFzU+gQSBXQIDAYFFAjY?= =?us-ascii?q?Ngl4ygiaPPYUhiReOTwqCIYZ/jXUbgjSHPIQhinGNfogCkGkCBAIEBQIOAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?FgWkhgVhwFWUBgkGCQhgggzqFFIU/c4Epj3UBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,486,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="628328131"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Sep 2019 17:17:55 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x89HHsHn031019 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:17:55 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:17:54 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:17:48 -0500
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:17:48 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YKjNGUCHenKVtottnQosBAk6ZSYawoPybx2srFJg8ib5Zler3PWWsbcedhveb6XEzmy06Eiws0hspwM+xg7S87Z0MEwNNj/3k0tcM7138wUIdlf3fwD0xykovAIEEJyi3ZHR+B5UimpY4/c9HkGdek5OI5n0ZC/VZ9vhARDFJXLTRbnpEqaAvtVE34Wgw+wFkkXR4JoLdHTZg+Z1oRz3bQ1XsIc271gtC81rMe4UNAT5h2eHdhay5QmTSyFL8olKWWRoJXLUWNEod1aKkQB45+KVwcH8vZIERGeLqJ8h0mOsr7hwclnP+ecV5wInmBIJJ7SGrT1o3wRkSj8KRfu0lA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ntvF19WDHulv8IK12t+exL3tjtgPHqilZaO/jnmMV4c=; b=ZlFqYFM8Lbhb+m5FNkOPJtaCxcPbWGR0IWCNp8ZS2LOznsKD/wW9dDa+OlxBte4or0VRyoOB8WUpifOoGvsk6TazCzJx+Ska0vy9uQ0TxCS7Wvedbm95fAuAQNbZA0nQA0CVXL9fLFj76izyoicz9kPEttJQ9k/e5myt87HtGbUFv+0/4UWJLKZknRApm4tnmYoppE9d7OOnCHAurBd37PmQrjlR5aiKe654ryJLf119FHUAsSMNo27BxSgsyH92WuU6U/kOfyfdjMSfEwuO7vC5OyZvqyhV0puvTNU2cjoRvcDndZlaflXYmdH1tZc67MvVlTOnOln61KxQvX7I6A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ntvF19WDHulv8IK12t+exL3tjtgPHqilZaO/jnmMV4c=; b=ptDoIp9JmRTTYrEfPISEJKmfwyyreSr+4d9tGmoZf1lbJyOofibwOIb0U9+34JnAU5yfnAalXAIlGGn8s21P8dldJEyQsSvbNuNk7uGGS9jH5Osl3989MfaTQgeuKGozoAcIm5ft1tGfv8saJCWyjTLHOCEwuI75+aVoUVH7t3M=
Received: from BY5PR11MB3990.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.162.95) by BY5PR11MB4184.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.163.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2241.15; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:17:46 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB3990.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3997:cece:5e36:49a8]) by BY5PR11MB3990.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3997:cece:5e36:49a8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2241.018; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:17:46 +0000
From: "Enke Chen (enkechen)" <enkechen@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt (9/2 to 9/17/2019)
Thread-Index: AdVht8Hop/hDHJozRuOf1u/upDEYlwFQBEUA
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:17:46 +0000
Message-ID: <0ECEEF05-5827-428B-8586-043003A4A8E0@cisco.com>
References: <003701d561b8$84171680$8c454380$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <003701d561b8$84171680$8c454380$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=enkechen@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1001::5b6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 596b68a7-9e45-4df7-fbf1-08d73549a253
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BY5PR11MB4184;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4184:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB4184651AF2D68B0C994FB1EDC5B70@BY5PR11MB4184.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 01559F388D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(366004)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(64756008)(606006)(446003)(11346002)(71200400001)(14444005)(71190400001)(7736002)(110136005)(478600001)(58126008)(966005)(14454004)(5660300002)(33656002)(6116002)(53936002)(66446008)(236005)(54896002)(2906002)(6512007)(66476007)(107886003)(76116006)(6486002)(66946007)(256004)(2501003)(316002)(6246003)(53546011)(6506007)(102836004)(6436002)(86362001)(8676002)(76176011)(46003)(4326008)(8936002)(486006)(2616005)(99286004)(186003)(81156014)(81166006)(36756003)(6306002)(476003)(229853002)(66556008)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY5PR11MB4184; H:BY5PR11MB3990.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 0TuOva/ZR6kXEHyql+MKaBn/FlIMQ1vYX7fVQCZSRK0//q8iKcqDxoUF61g010cI2WxVgK8T5BjUYDtkKA7A8U8J6VGMaoo/OeScuPL2BzAL8uYUsFxz1LWgD+R8s6kPl4zzlIaMylw/qldB7Gamf+JZlP0ZZCUz+CoAV6ubAsNKgigIVrbmpj5VyLPhdkcvfDyOfIL5FPnvTMnsfTHPkxWBs1AmOV6MaeIeYwkNF/lBdOW3OFgc8o7BneBbtW/mkEOHVI1sHomecQQHQzM4pI5hxBL3N49IKTbnYPGm+aS2Mb1z4Hbx492C//6tFD8ElDM+g33nCWac8RGahQRFRMemoW8BvIlhQprv/n2MlL99eFVmmsB9vgfPX/IzUJJy1P3WfChcdeVaBYDhW71VZ/FrnYaa5qhMfuSGVOTprow=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0ECEEF055827428B8586043003A4A8E0ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 596b68a7-9e45-4df7-fbf1-08d73549a253
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Sep 2019 17:17:46.6973 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: H2cqHuJLs/unIO3r9Q2wl/TcGWhsUDVZLY5JIAZWRCyuf7/BUYtlfZgWUXA+UuvS9ae/zRWNF69o7XhNd4bVgA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4184
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BpqDisuU09_24t8U3H-JnSSists>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt (9/2 to 9/17/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:18:00 -0000

Support its adoption.

However, as I talked with some of the co-authors privately, this “Value” filed (i.e., the BFD Flags) of the capability
does not server any useful purpose and is not needed.  I suggest the field be removed.

Thanks.  -- Enke

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Monday, September 2, 2019 at 11:02 AM
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt (9/2 to 9/17/2019)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode-02.txt which you can access at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merciaz-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode/

For those who have indicated support for this draft during the lengthy IPR call, you are welcome to comment again
or to trust that the IDR chairs read your comments during the lengthy IPR call.

Please indicate if you think this draft is a good start for using the BFD technology
as a check that prevents BGP connectivity until BFD session is established
(indicating link connectivity).

Cheerily, Susan Hares