Re: [Idr] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-13

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BAC3A09EA; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:40:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4uBHzp8KAgNS; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C993A09EC; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:40:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id d2so750962pjs.4; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:40:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=hBqnd8rOpK0jXcMmrJF5mfuJL0jBx2kJhosL2YtIP2Y=; b=Db/rgDxfOuk7FXpm4DDN/0f/9T83PrEs6SY9Q32zoQX4bUEziwh+0QzEwxFxhPV5ju CiEo5fnVZ5aFNlQElYB6y5oTI3johVKlV9YxZAeUgsonc0LY9vFqEgQO/bujbhL6KvlS dXRPYrqmnpL6SJ8VpT5vULDjx6S+EDFR5ht4iXZ+k1MpHiXUO9mkgLhe9rAXWUIunEfC FwwnjyyOWOmaJfqOiYtWVk0tIrn5m44hVtnfoyuOhq3HDW8mQ/nlK2WT9BYqZSzZL2aK jSgrD5v0VBqyO8mT0kpmP5gdG6puJDZFjs/VVXl5Lusp+3VNCvGJNg9PDqgvi3dd8qGl iwCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=hBqnd8rOpK0jXcMmrJF5mfuJL0jBx2kJhosL2YtIP2Y=; b=e38mVnnKdoNbajjo2lXiCEjwxFjRh1bL7OyIC3fCgueUgXIyHrtoH0rD9YGgV5ztNz Wr7QwCa8D/7gVx4h9kAobIZeiBoHPl8bJismUrf/wpdY3alndcQ1GzRYn1qjBpwZ9sU0 4bMuJUWjOMoxFSdOE1CRPEVArJwUT/E9yRBC4Aj0r0mUdPu4vR0Bp99k8Ce4cI8IbK6c kxf5h0+U4NRTmGf9AI6By49qDmXmBBeXecLq4Du/JV0qwkT/GEVayVK3r0F5F4ozw85p mdSmpMHNRLXh1Zb8w6DQH7kPruGLvnwOWYliN6y3DsQ4ZpynYL0ap8LnSQmTS7orgMg5 A2+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CWvpgcGjze7J9rOuvxAOUPRKxnbtFjklQgIRndcJ0t5x7zRjL b6ZgkVvSSZ2NUGZTWZMCDaqWSJgLg8m9TQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlKAuDVusFr8Qro1hsx/vYgf6gkuhDEH8xCJEu5DFhdeRRjLHLS4acmYOjSheRjRLIIl0kQQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b089:b029:e3:28:b8ee with SMTP id p9-20020a170902b089b02900e30028b8eemr2810363plr.84.1613626846780; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e1sm429166pjm.12.2021.02.17.21.40.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:40:39 -0800
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: "=?utf-8?Q?ops-dir=40ietf.org?=" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "=?utf-8?Q?draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution.all=40ietf.org?=" <draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution.all@ietf.org>, "=?utf-8?Q?idr=40ietf.org?=" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <4dbee969-4efa-4f04-aa8f-8d0eaac9b274@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <D3296841-4DE7-4852-A573-27DFDE35ECA7@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <161340670871.11578.4839224279059815588@ietfa.amsl.com> <048a2e10-94d7-4468-8377-1de5d4ba0d80@Spark> <D3296841-4DE7-4852-A573-27DFDE35ECA7@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 4dbee969-4efa-4f04-aa8f-8d0eaac9b274@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="602dfddc_12200854_168b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Jqvp6SYz1JWBCmv2HNuHRZitQjY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-13
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:40:56 -0000

Dear Tim,

Many thanks for your comments, I have published v14 that should address it.

Cheers,
Jeff
On Feb 16, 2021, 5:20 AM -0800, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>uk>, wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks, a couple of points responded to below, rest trimmed…
>
> > On 16 Feb 2021, at 03:39, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2021, 8:31 AM -0800, Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>rg>, wrote:
> >
> > Nits:
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> > The abstract doesn’t actually say what this draft defines.
> > Add at the end of the current abstract paragraph something like “This document
> > defines extensions to BGP-LS for advertisement of extended administrative
> > groups (EAGs) to allow it to support administrative groups of size greater than
> > [jeff] in this context - “extended” (RFC7308) means - larger that 32 bits, I’ll happily clarify this
> > 32 bits.”
>
> Thanks. The abstract only states the problem, not what the document provides as the solution.
>
> > Section 1:
> >
> > The BGP-LS advertisement is encoded -> The BGP-LS advertisement for the
> > originally defined (non-extended) administrative groups is encoded (Adds
> > clarity)
> > [jeff] you’d like me to compare extended encoding to the original (non-extended) one? Please note - the draft doesn’t define new attributes, EAG has been defined in the RFC7308, but provides BGP-LS transport for it
>
> No need, my point is that reading it as is it’s not clear which administrative groups that text refers to.
>
> Best wishes,
> Tim
>