[Idr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Special thanks to Susan Hares for her recent and detailed shepherd's write up.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated).

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

Is there any reason why the shepherd is not acknowledged in the document ?

-- Section 2 --
Strongly suggest s/protocol port numbers/protocol or port numbers/

Please expand "RR" at first use.

-- Section 4.2 --
Suggest to add also a reference to section 4 of RFC 8955 rather than "[RFC8955] states:"