IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <chengli13@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC88C3A12A9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxaLh4chhEJJ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6903A12A8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 188DC6B75D554E3DF255 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:27:28 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) by lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:27:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.40) by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:27:27 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.203]) by dggeml423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:27:20 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13
Thread-Index: AdYcqS9OUz9dKgHYTcabF1VCt18RHQAne0KQ
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:27:20 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB029F84D1@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <005201d61ca9$71152430$533f6c90$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <005201d61ca9$71152430$533f6c90$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.229]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB029F84D1dggeml529mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/OyvR-0AHbBm1rgXnuSGopY92IKM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:27:32 -0000

Hi Susan,

Thank you for your notification. Already uploaded the text.

Also, we updated the error handling rules to align with the rules defined in draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy. Also, added text of Implementation status.

Will address the comments from Ketan and Aijun and Linda ASAP. Many thanks!

Best Regards,
Cheng






A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01.txt

has been successfully submitted by Cheng Li and posted to the IETF repository.



Name:                  draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu

Revision:              01

Title:                      Segment Routing Path MTU in BGP

Document date:               2020-04-28

Group:                  idr

Pages:                   9

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu/

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01

Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu

Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01



Abstract:

   Segment Routing is a source routing paradigm that explicitly

   indicates the forwarding path for packets at the ingress node.  An SR

   policy is a set of candidate SR paths consisting of one or more

   segment lists with necessary path attributes.  However, the path

   maximum transmission unit (MTU) information for SR path is not

   available in the SR policy since the SR does not require signaling.

   This document defines extensions to BGP to distribute path MTU

   information within SR policies.









Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.



The IETF Secretariat


From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 11:35 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13

The comment period on the adoption of draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt has completed.
The IDR WG has reached consensus to adopt this draft.

The authors should submit this draft as draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-00.txt.

Cheerily, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email