Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13
"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 01:41 UTC
Return-Path: <chengli13@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A35B3A0C75 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.82, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cH20UP6R2pjT for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B27FE3A0C74 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 87E062410E6ED0118411 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:40:58 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:40:58 +0100
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:40:57 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.203]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:40:55 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13
Thread-Index: AdYcqS9OUz9dKgHYTcabF1VCt18RHQAne0KQ//+stQD//Ro/cA==
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:40:55 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB029FAC69@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <005201d61ca9$71152430$533f6c90$@ndzh.com> <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB029F84D1@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com> <00a801d61d60$85ed36b0$91c7a410$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00a801d61d60$85ed36b0$91c7a410$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.229]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB029FAC69dggeml529mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tZvvNkaVLNtV3LrbeowzNVNwsIs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:41:04 -0000
Hi Susan, Will do! Best regards, Cheng From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:26 PM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) <chengli13@huawei.com>; idr@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13 Cheng: Please send a note to the list when you address the issues from Ketan, Aijun and Linda. Thanks, Susan Hares From: Chengli (Cheng Li) [mailto:chengli13@huawei.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 6:27 AM To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13 Hi Susan, Thank you for your notification. Already uploaded the text. Also, we updated the error handling rules to align with the rules defined in draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy. Also, added text of Implementation status. Will address the comments from Ketan and Aijun and Linda ASAP. Many thanks! Best Regards, Cheng A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Cheng Li and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu Revision: 01 Title: Segment Routing Path MTU in BGP Document date: 2020-04-28 Group: idr Pages: 9 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01 Abstract: Segment Routing is a source routing paradigm that explicitly indicates the forwarding path for packets at the ingress node. An SR policy is a set of candidate SR paths consisting of one or more segment lists with necessary path attributes. However, the path maximum transmission unit (MTU) information for SR path is not available in the SR policy since the SR does not require signaling. This document defines extensions to BGP to distribute path MTU information within SR policies. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 11:35 PM To: idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org> Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13 The comment period on the adoption of draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt has completed. The IDR WG has reached consensus to adopt this draft. The authors should submit this draft as draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-00.txt. Cheerily, Susan Hares
- [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt … Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt … Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt … Chengli (Cheng Li)