IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 11 July 2019 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C598812013C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcaSsYzsVaSn for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2ECB12010F for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C58A1E2F2; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:19:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:19:20 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190711141919.GC4922@pfrc.org>
References: <c28cbce0-2033-1224-eb73-be81fc436390@hq.sk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c28cbce0-2033-1224-eb73-be81fc436390@hq.sk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/PQ2ZLOomyUIVGueuC6ZEOFjN7o8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:18:34 -0000

Followup, since this also popped up on my TODO:

Juniper and Nokia have implementations.

I requested in 2016 an early allocation on the BGP optional parameter code
point.  This has not been done.

I believe once we have a re-publish of the document that we should proceed
with a working group last call.

-- Jeff

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:56:09PM +0100, Robert Varga wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> what is the current status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?
> 
> The document itself is expired and looking through archives I only found
> the June 2016 discussion which resulted in -05 and Jeff's July 2016
> mention the draft is being deployed and missing an early allocation.
> 
> Has the document been actively abandoned, or is it just something that
> fell through the cracks?
> 
> Thanks,
> Robert
> 




> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email