Re: [Idr] Status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Mon, 15 July 2019 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964E81202EF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmkzJ9L2Lg2T for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DEA41202F4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nitebug.nitenet.local (chello085216197060.chello.sk [85.216.197.60]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43A22243551; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 22:00:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1563220842; bh=4ZdsDmDGl+AdeWdbZ7Dk3+Mp3bsyYFVRd1h9RYM/Zpw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=V1H+84hGtN8p0HZHm3qJMg7/j+LpcE+kB/2nH99gX5B6LJrADWzBiZ9KXbklKZ5co wYvwEStf+gvFs88otH6ZGktn5sm/EZuQyFVl/uPTEiUKRhm2aYEr1w0/RZvxnUrrCH 10wahiCyGVy2mh0UJljkHPP7E+XS5synjzU1AVU4=
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
References: <c28cbce0-2033-1224-eb73-be81fc436390@hq.sk> <20190711141919.GC4922@pfrc.org> <00cd01d53821$cfaa5320$6efef960$@ndzh.com> <20190711211507.GD4922@pfrc.org>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <86deb2b8-446d-e3e6-ac5d-79406e47892c@hq.sk>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 22:00:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190711211507.GD4922@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OigMPwi4ignyRfIUrqnQvTrGE6NquSwAw"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/gKQox_p4LwjF15Lpu2vPzn0aUmY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:00:54 -0000

On 11/07/2019 23:15, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Sue,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
>> Do you still want an early allocation?  We can suggest the value you already
>> have used. 
> 
> We're largely not burning through optional parameter code points very
> quickly.  That said, we should get this registered by the most expedient
> manner possible to prevent conflicts.
> 
> A WGLC of this document would do that.  John has it queueud for re-publish
> once the submission gates are open.
> 
> If we think process will stall it for whatever reason, perhaps consider the
> early allocation.

+1, we should nail the allocation down ASAP.

Regards,
Robert