IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 01 March 2024 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E888CC14F6B5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:20:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQvL9DezLf8e for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:20:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15847C15154A for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-563d56ee65cso3933408a12.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:19:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; t=1709313593; x=1709918393; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZlidAQPGG7Sr23MZJysy9W8QTxUVoAwM5UfjYHZX83I=; b=Q09R/fh/zOhVw+Z9VgrYyJlknAYwF84klE2baCDCOGLGESNFVZxucl2wi0CWvTORfW 7ajCL6i4fJ12V9RnsH+UuzcNAojD2RaseUyEUPYlisc1MzK438PAQYaDwksM0lRLsXc5 SHnEVa7QfgvuB4de8CUdA9oGJjpKStZJWq9Q0NTID+73adUjElE4QFKk1zfyoDqbvyoV VcxTWrUEVqLKmHnIEquhLKXmML7SSe7/S4Sh1ayW4AoJynd2rUURDIwXelayt9S5j1Qj l2zNfynMeHXqn2M7tKrS/k5twxPo90/YXAksJi5ISiiY1bG6Wte5je9NAFqDwmyjfqUs Hpvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709313593; x=1709918393; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZlidAQPGG7Sr23MZJysy9W8QTxUVoAwM5UfjYHZX83I=; b=JWePSRJRssO2ABwUIEPgRpf84y9+XUuSmu3b5PlEv7MmTNvWOrHwukCoGqHjMObWow 1rRH9NCr0s+A8tDfvX3yOSsoRbRpTlynN9Pz2z7YPjmoEGKTG9mD4b+sDUcsi9VWypgt +pD1RJ/xbi+1PwYRdxdoXhSdeyztc9030M2xm/OBdnrZIf7sPwMF/pJeO/AptYcnzh+G xd6f/+zD4CBtp7u4BfAksKkh9+PCRIxt8l7n2frMAAwQd2k7NRFGAO7dszuwwPc6seZd 4TWV0AgA9euf6TGwTicZ77eY3n1eB4o7kGevwOshPq3LgviANIb3gFPNrO1EnyUk3zvB pETQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX7fP0lezCpURllhbOquAVBea06BqSvu7nCQo+yZMqvvEZxVws+wtbANvYpxAIMEGJ+1Ftymz3ekt+Gt5k=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxgFLhdE1izuiCeOBqdt26gshEhBF7rmyFVq4I3QTYCpGtjkBDW 3EYcK/PQMfbnptYSmvR/piSZMjlEmbioKQuYkIM0iQpJIE/f6LKq9R2xS2RQ2ECzyU8WVT5O272 Inknx2ykcftfcfS1QXKBxyOGd/jlJIGql5w0P/8pqmmSbCKEYL7Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFrNnXASiz/XHix/91c/ATHof0GTvGCaLsvDVcX9BOzE5/tEFJzmSgbUJNBzyV3l/D6Zw4H+B66zKDtahNF8cw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1e86:b0:566:c388:ceb4 with SMTP id f6-20020a0564021e8600b00566c388ceb4mr1877010edf.28.1709313592812; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:19:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO6PR05MB7796D42F85108E8EA4A3B445AC592@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CO6PR05MB7796219AF6A418AAA3C5D456AC5E2@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMGisd=NyDAJRxqeU6tEX3JATh4_tH5jMLbedOpOGCajNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR05MB7796176A0E6CDDB3CAA15B72AC5E2@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR05MB7796176A0E6CDDB3CAA15B72AC5E2@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 18:19:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHsF=9NeRHR=bsJswy=3dRjxiTgQdGR96TkQ4QezQYykg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082740306129c953f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/QY2-6P_bgMXmyEH9bZKHuMsizRM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:20:10 -0000

Oh you want to freeze some work in IDR with the broken concept of "trusted
domain" :)  Note in IDR we call it One Administrative Domain.

But please do not ...

IDR is not about that - quite contrary it is about Inter-Domain Routing and
last time I checked SRv6 is using packets with IPv6 headers which as such
*are* globally routable by the notion of longest locator match.

Cheers,
Robert

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 6:13 PM Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net> wrote:

> please follow the int-area and discussion around pending drafts, amongst
> them trusted domain discussions …
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>    - tony
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
> From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
> *Date: *Friday, 1 March 2024 at 18:06
> *To: *Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net>
> *Cc: *Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org <idr@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
> Hi Antoni,
>
>
>
> on it since I think that given the current SRv6 security discussion and
> situation it’s premature to advance anything relying on SRv6 to anything
> close to a standards document until the security
> model/concerns/architecture are clarified.
>
>
>
> For those who do not track all IETF WGs actively could you please provide
> a link to this discussion and explain/summarize the "situation" ?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Robert
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email