IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 01 March 2024 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC53C14F75F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:06:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zdnK70Sfwgf4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3232C14F749 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-565ef8af2f5so3465713a12.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:06:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; t=1709312768; x=1709917568; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yKBMiLWWhAM7YpLt79keSLTYnzfZH4OPz1NKg4KxOBA=; b=fy+u8jq5P4dCJMy+QuRC2pqDhwtxNZwE1cbXZtcO/QWrmZ9kay4UjsfC+ZH1w6GqjK 0+6mLsmPreZjyMzaunyo1CtcCzx26azgz5Ix68AZ7von97rsS8bm2LLdPBOnkUmw6Wny CUh0GTH0fZuu27LQIVQ1VVlhr9UTnTH8hf9jbJZZl8Z9RIz2kxVqNJhjP7cq7DV/iOOI AeXkO6R+Cij8FNp1w7MFAMvyT+56IbUJkNfH2PjQ0crCigMXFCiJtw+Gg7x9QqOeK+d3 7HWe9w5ecmUDF0fxXjbSp8lgHUYnCrAeCHkOrcL6EiC0wf2ncNZcYiTG1hwjfJOaploZ bvWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709312768; x=1709917568; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yKBMiLWWhAM7YpLt79keSLTYnzfZH4OPz1NKg4KxOBA=; b=Sq4JjJooDJ9+gJZMVFeSV8re3ICpWaTyCDu3j0K50kYhJqJKEXneqVOG/RJp67T35z 048+MDDH+zbG68Zt8RX4wFOjH5sHMFQ0Nf+MI6qkETQFvwBmMRSlBl5FjgoP6iZBKQ/Z Xyv3gY4eAYGGozCd440UaVRYDjkkbTTWz3e3IrG3JQwDNkZYk1d+ip4kwhyFBSTE19fj 3dKkgqmkO0cVI4EnMgQX1Tpg5d323eKk3W8spCMFCn/6RPrHG/mpef+JnonhCRRnGKE1 8pjZQzpgIn5mxfody4KPg7FxgdWCNT5FQadZVC+FSgJZt1pRWWaX8YsMqYrmNDVhuW7r GrkA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUZvMQ61G7spl81n7lbZ5Mm2ckI/jEcFcm9U0fGW+Ew7oPDkZT7r9bkRQeAySRgLTzZ+7UwLUBDo+eH3KE=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzHws9UyfyzNYpyyEORGIKeH9NX45+Uyl7Yj7kgWVziAZkJK5cR tZ/9Br6o0/be9QE4xyOIy3GL2zLw+Qd86gpvS0g267KLeBLUKfRUuKUPEgUpGHmB6iF22JLMiyS j5ldWtqLwZCUm547SIMUc607qlmZsiI3V1ALeOSdP94149TA3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFfhdgfA0UN3fGoDJxlmqDMtbcvqSlK/TWOuy+N7q/bcvCBcvvpv7kemnRO+6jm6U10rsn2ATvye4MIDDvosD8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1848:b0:566:a7c0:c8e8 with SMTP id v8-20020a056402184800b00566a7c0c8e8mr1972182edy.12.1709312768450; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:06:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO6PR05MB7796D42F85108E8EA4A3B445AC592@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CO6PR05MB7796219AF6A418AAA3C5D456AC5E2@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR05MB7796219AF6A418AAA3C5D456AC5E2@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 18:05:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGisd=NyDAJRxqeU6tEX3JATh4_tH5jMLbedOpOGCajNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoni Przygienda <prz=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005fcac906129c6424"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/wNznrnJLWyJZEaowbeUijFtVQek>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:06:21 -0000

Hi Antoni,


> on it since I think that given the current SRv6 security discussion and
> situation it’s premature to advance anything relying on SRv6 to anything
> close to a standards document until the security
> model/concerns/architecture are clarified.
>

For those who do not track all IETF WGs actively could you please provide a
link to this discussion and explain/summarize the "situation" ?

Thank you,
Robert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email