IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Fri, 01 March 2024 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC79C14F604 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:44:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K9zjwhGKeowv for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071C1C18DB97 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7d5bfdd2366so1093016241.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:44:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709315039; x=1709919839; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s9GcGrrBslC1yAeTDoJfY9KH14z/GEYO4+23fvaW5I4=; b=nkjjC3GubirsAuw+e01z+sUHyTqSJjQMznaRI3RKkrnd03AauawICgAlJ8zowP15+k nXOrPF0mDpaX10x3xlMVECXJrMxLAEa5fXSQitmIjSX9nAZYScXU/J5MKzOzrJeTlBvA wDhpr660V8Db/Z3U398seGVX+gYtGuA72G5DbHSM5Aia84WbMCvxm+/fF0JFeVrq7tI/ iKek255wyB+djNXk5nfusBoz4+l9ccZFvAQwUf6Mqqs5V2UQsMw1oU28pNafgTcoa26i 5cxl5IU2WRmirs0H09s8yq7FB5XtQKbQfVrCx4JjmnRtx8aopUmDiJN5JWFbOZ/wYbkt m2yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709315039; x=1709919839; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=s9GcGrrBslC1yAeTDoJfY9KH14z/GEYO4+23fvaW5I4=; b=D3N7uMI5uN3/tNNtfsyyFbDtQjKsV71KSQHxivMgpCVxHySOlVKeg6z4WtmZgFN3Ye YcfGiIHLezvBUwfEtz0ILNPNhzoQeoSc1WaYjW2Gc9m4V0BnFXjqnFF9djN1G70AuymK C68/t8BUKYdzY8oxQ2FtTaKtW+/G/ewZqyOfbPb37Jmkg1UHzPSHvIPSIZxV7PCDDea7 IeHRcvKfVtJ2CzA2dRkuzje0yqj3niYI9ApPtTqhHTVrBvYaADL89rmeyfnsP6A58GUK 1Zrn70PWAJwFcIERr3uN39+EKxL7PGzpmVZ1RhblSQZsGWwLzzJgEXyHHN6Uz/053evX zXgg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV9rZ6Aq1MXwRBnjvoJo60uVJr1deEqj4Zli+XIWokwC2B+LzuJgix5BdStejMnZky48SmE6rEQ5th0b8Y=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzsfbjVAMeMzYa8ffiCeXXljOQFdmHw0YgWsXYlOZnY1T2l/XGo 2Xp6HIlrhc9zVznEOPA0/cK6SxI3e1zKd6EUrzGusWIMJmaAQa6Cuqjxcb0p+y2d0BkXUJc2GEU GWyPGXPWVzY04WG+iSIRJ7SodDWyZuTt5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4Jr2Sihk/pWTL8Y/oJy4qw0L4jK/LIeJP2AySJL5z6yV3NPAH6EIrepI3/M1v4wYwq8S5yLr59s6bj+HTYMg=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f651:0:b0:471:e4df:38c4 with SMTP id u17-20020a67f651000000b00471e4df38c4mr2100297vso.19.1709315039314; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:43:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO6PR05MB7796D42F85108E8EA4A3B445AC592@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CO6PR05MB7796219AF6A418AAA3C5D456AC5E2@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMGisd=NyDAJRxqeU6tEX3JATh4_tH5jMLbedOpOGCajNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR05MB7796176A0E6CDDB3CAA15B72AC5E2@CO6PR05MB7796.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHsF=9NeRHR=bsJswy=3dRjxiTgQdGR96TkQ4QezQYykg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHsF=9NeRHR=bsJswy=3dRjxiTgQdGR96TkQ4QezQYykg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 18:43:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hNqVTj24Xu0cY2-bXC_DypaziFMurjJy92FXW5PoMW-mw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba47c206129ceb26"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/uOXaRcCYKadk14LK0Sj0A6wpjoU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 17:44:26 -0000

Is Webster unclear in its definition of "abstain", Robert?

And if you have objections to the SRv6 security work, please follow the
according groups and comment there. This is not the place ...

-- tony



On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 6:20 PM Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

>
> Oh you want to freeze some work in IDR with the broken concept of "trusted
> domain" :)  Note in IDR we call it One Administrative Domain.
>
> But please do not ...
>
> IDR is not about that - quite contrary it is about Inter-Domain Routing
> and last time I checked SRv6 is using packets with IPv6 headers which
> as such *are* globally routable by the notion of longest locator match.
>
> Cheers,
> Robert
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 6:13 PM Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net> wrote:
>
>> please follow the int-area and discussion around pending drafts, amongst
>> them trusted domain discussions …
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>    - tony
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>> From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
>> *Date: *Friday, 1 March 2024 at 18:06
>> *To: *Antoni Przygienda <prz@juniper.net>
>> *Cc: *Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org <idr@ietf.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Idr] 2nd WG LC for CT drafts - which includes
>> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-srv6, and
>> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fwd-rr-01 (2/16/2024 to 3/1/2024).
>>
>> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Antoni,
>>
>>
>>
>> on it since I think that given the current SRv6 security discussion and
>> situation it’s premature to advance anything relying on SRv6 to anything
>> close to a standards document until the security
>> model/concerns/architecture are clarified.
>>
>>
>>
>> For those who do not track all IETF WGs actively could you please provide
>> a link to this discussion and explain/summarize the "situation" ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email