IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] One week extension to WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-large-community

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 15 November 2016 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53871293D8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:40:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7phCX9EsiFa for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8231294FD for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id a197so201634220wmd.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:40:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=m5z0LAAZ70c8Oee9oo5YBNeOB2K8e5mRkq7Ld7gjMRY=; b=k+Tf0HZlEYlQDoZwKcciMRXiFfs63V1A5V9UZQp3b0kTKUWzCkBqu+96ulEuoWeCqj r/TZUHZwP7wxKdgkqx76cIswwIWLbXiXu81K/Oe0cO1rI29SILc3tB2mCOcYD0DOatT/ H7W4wlUoI6Sy7TuL4S/InBCjfs0xlNG22dOu+/c59iHYoodLWmwKfzdvRY4FMUvlK9Mj Gh4DCtTBIRTYU4ZK0R6A10CzPgU+WwawbgqV6r006/jS6bhaZiHgTmbXHxf7GBcigbea vhGmY2QoGtxJQUOEv/xg3aQK93qhJvI8AJf7hqqpgHzvJUM+AMX913eZnOdWJdNMP2yg Y4xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=m5z0LAAZ70c8Oee9oo5YBNeOB2K8e5mRkq7Ld7gjMRY=; b=UTlc3UoEub2ZO8SN1fheaNaGOHaPEDzyB8itUTXc28urYRKrvYwTaK1VTqZC9MdnqT Alk7zpCmj7leW0OF1mv05cjRogST1A6gKERhZ36yS9EBtHa07Cv3Q4KNr+AVNCNCIcbI aGGeiPSbMUTsmaTsYzJClUco7Vvp3MdtCV6Ck3Yfm7VVXQxM6qehCwySJSIlwAMq8Dll zT+lEyWOUtExH07TbeUFcT2c+Om7SPVDeViKAMwFQiH3KyvZLqdEXZNctwwf6mpu7Dx3 ZoXW65iSNFQCKekrOqNtMMYHsUGkh2WSfnr1F7vrniIbj3xDVCQ5CHig4me3GJr5MD6a Lgiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfKR1hOIzUKx3UEthvm8tEe2UfLfhicH0z2ozafHYWY8J5l0zm5qsohx8KIrbxw2u4IzsSquktoLypxYQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.26.133 with SMTP id l5mr26336662wjg.4.1479253204351; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:40:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.80.137.69 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:40:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.80.137.69 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:40:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=2JYZ+YOVPiao-sFPUReQUxY6cYq8UR8oajhbm9t625g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <FDA477F5-0F7A-449B-9C3F-7453FE8CB716@juniper.net> <C7D1A165-A9E5-4C9D-BC8F-1F5BB14C192F@juniper.net> <27701_1479159582_582A2F1E_27701_6903_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A1EC77FE1@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <736EA2CC-3DD1-4F14-96ED-2916E62F6F02@cisco.com> <26709_1479217575_582B11A7_26709_12999_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A1EC79584@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CA+b+ER=SEcEFW4OxMx8qTxjpu1eyzKFH0TxshsoTS3oz6MvFBw@mail.gmail.com> <a23c2ece-591d-8089-db71-67a3b28802c3@i3d.net> <CA+b+ERn6pk4pRTDObhWTe5NerfBRUUvJT7CjM+B1qVLA420LUQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161115182648.GD94469@shrubbery.net> <CA+b+ERmCnO=7N8ViuQnp-QqSaXLAPaw2dbowgHJ3v0itzpa3_g@mail.gmail.com> <20161115222738.GW94469@shrubbery.net> <582B92B7.9080309@foobar.org> <CA+b+ERkiM5qqF7RMACP01hMDWPRpEroMFVA2u_4zcC3D8_SmFw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=2JYZ+YOVPiao-sFPUReQUxY6cYq8UR8oajhbm9t625g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:40:03 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _fpC8kFkgK-w1UDMr3z5Zl-MAwc
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkJdEeYVcfMvQTaiJa9_MPFRs+JEU0in7Y3sy38U8DkOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0160a4d6c7407605415f79a9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RwVW-lg_Ee3wAapOIqot4MbIUGk>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] One week extension to WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-large-community
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:40:08 -0000

If large is to be like 1997 and if current semantics works why is this
entire debate of special handling duplicates.

Entire section can be removed and what the guy who is inserting and the one
who is acting on be left completely up to them.

Thx,
R.

On Nov 16, 2016 7:57 AM, "Nick Hilliard" <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

heasley wrote:
> i think this discussion is becoming silly.  can god make a boulder so big
that
> he himself can not lift it.

+1

the existing semantics work nicely in practice. There is no compelling
reason to change them.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email