Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt
"wangw36@chinatelecom.cn" <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn> Tue, 25 August 2020 02:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D2F3A1076 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDYoumFGsEPI for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.228]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314973A1077 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.92:61270.1842171997
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.76?logid-d020ca642ac6483580388b8690933265 (unknown [172.18.0.92]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 1A5462800CE; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:11:53 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 71096013@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.92]) by App0021 with ESMTP id d020ca642ac6483580388b8690933265 for ju1738@att.com; Tue Aug 25 10:11:56 2020
X-Transaction-ID: d020ca642ac6483580388b8690933265
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.92
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:11:52 +0800
From: "wangw36@chinatelecom.cn" <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn>
To: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>, "Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <sergey.fomin@nokia.com>
Cc: idr <idr@ietf.org>
References: <159823342044.23031.16551144892707874928@ietfa.amsl.com>, <202008240951001271894@chinatelecom.cn>, <BYAPR08MB54935CC14FAD4B91D3331ED185560@BYAPR08MB5493.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>, <9ae4a998586744aaa2705307b1fce7c9@att.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.17.58[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2020082510115190686436@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart460630870032_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ZpeM3o3K7qqs9wt7-kfcIr5FAsI>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:25:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 02:12:13 -0000
Hi Sergey and Jim, Thanks for your review. Please see comments in-line. Best Regards, Wei Wang China Telecom wangw36@chinatelecom.cn From: UTTARO, JAMES Date: 2020-08-25 05:43 To: Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View); wangw36@chinatelecom.cn CC: idr Subject: RE: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt Comments In-Line. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 4:28 PM To: wangw36@chinatelecom.cn Cc: idr <idr@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt Hi Wei Wang, From your description of existing solutions: > 4) Configure the Maximum Prefix for each VRF on edge nodes > > When a VRF overflows, PE will break down the BGP session with RR > according to the Maximum Prefix mechanism. However, there may have > several VRFs on PE rely on the PE-RR session, this mechanism will > influence other VRFs. This is not correct. A good implementation of _per-vrf prefix-limit_ does not mandate MP-BGP session teardown, it allows to use soft actions instead, such as discard routes + log. [Jim U>] Yup.. That is the way my implementations work.. The goal is to ensure maximum correctness of a given VPN. Tearing down the PE-RR session is killing a fly with a sledge hammer.. [Wei Wang] But the soft actions cannot reduce the burden of PE. Additionally, if you insist that a local-only discard mechanism is not good enough (why?) [Wei Wang] Because for the overflow PE, a local-only discard mechanism can't make it better. If it receive more VPN routes continuously, it must waste more resources to log them. and you want to prevent route advertisement(s) from an RR/remote PE for a specific VRF, it is hard to see real-world benefits of the proposed solution vs, for example, extra logic on top of RTC (i.e. if you implement a feature "withdraw an RTC route after FIB/memory utilization reaches 95%"). [Wei Wang] Yes, VRF with 0% reachability may be achieved in this way. Yes, RD-ORF might be a bit more granular in such case, but does it bring any benefit? VRF with 50% reachability or VRF with 0% reachability from a given PE are both examples of unintended network state (and the earlier could be worse) that requires intervention. [Wei Wang] In my opinion, VRF with 50% reachability may be able to keep part of user traffic normal. It is better than VRF with 0% reachability. -- Sergey From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of wangw36@chinatelecom.cn Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2020 6:51 PM To: idr <idr@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt Hi IDR experts, Based on the previous discussion, we update our draft as follows: the description of the limitations of existing solutions is added clarifying that the operation process of RD-ORF on each device is independent modifying the withdraw mechanism of RD-ORF Any comments are welcome. Best Regards. Wei Wang China Telecom wangw36@chinatelecom.cn From: internet-drafts Date: 2020-08-24 09:43 To: Haibo Wang; Gyan S. Mishra; Wei Wang; Aijun Wang; Shunwan Zhuang; Jie Dong; Gyan Mishra Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt A new version of I-D, draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Wei Wang and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-wang-idr-rd-orf Revision: 03 Title: Route Distinguisher Outbound Route Filter (RD-ORF) for BGP-4 Document date: 2020-08-24 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 14 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-03 Abstract: This draft defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the Route Distinguisher ORF (RD-ORF). RD-ORF is applicable when the routers do not exchange VPN routing information directly (e.g. routers in single-domain connect via Route Reflector, or routers in Option B/Option AB/Option C cross-domain scenario). Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Wei Wang
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… Gyan Mishra