Re: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00

["Osborne, Eric" <[e-mail]>]

-1, I guess, is my vote.  Not that we vote around here.  

I'm not sure I understand the practical benefit of closing it when we know there's stuff missing.  It's in WG LC, right?  Isn't the point to find things that need to be addressed *now*, rather than push it out the nest as quickly as possible when we already know we have a change to make?

Adding EAG to bgp-ls isn't a big deal.  And it's not like people have never shipped product based on mature draft standards before.  Why not do it right while we still have the chance?




eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 4:25 AM
> To: Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie); Jan Medved (jmedved); Hannes Gredler;
> Jeff Tantsura
> Cc: [e-mail]; Hares Susan
> Subject: Re: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
> 
> +1
> Let's close the base spec for BGP-LS.
> 
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)
> 发送时间: 2014年10月31日 2:19
> 收件人: Jan Medved (jmedved); Hannes Gredler; Jeff Tantsura
> 抄送: [e-mail]; Hares Susan
> 主题: Re: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
> 
> Agree,
> 
> Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jan Medved (jmedved)
> Sent: jeudi 30 octobre 2014 19:03
> To: Hannes Gredler; Jeff Tantsura
> Cc: [e-mail]; Hares Susan
> Subject: Re: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
> 
> +1
> 
> bgp-ls is in the WG last call, let¹s not restart that clock.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jan
> 
> 
> On 10/30/14, 12:30 AM, "Hannes Gredler" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> >real question is:
> >
> >do we want to close BGP-LS base spec and submit it to IESG or leave it
> >open as an eternal draft ? - IMO EAG is a useful thing hence vendors
> >will be adding support for this, but can perfectly live as a standalone
> >document,
> >
> >/hannes
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 06:12:28PM +0000, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> >|    Hi Eric,
> >|    Agree, should be treated same way as AG and included in bgp-ls,
> >|    Extended Administrative Group with TLV code point 1099
> >|    Cheers,
> >|    Jeff
> >|    From: <Osborne>, Eric <[1][e-mail]>
> >|    Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 at 6:48 AM
> >|    To: wangzitao <[2][e-mail]>, "[3][e-mail]"
> >|    <[4][e-mail]>
> >|    Cc: Hares Susan <[5][e-mail]>
> >|    Subject: Re: [Idr] New version of
> >| draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
> >|
> >|      I skimmed it and it  looks reasonable.  Given  that it really
> >| just
> > says
> >|      ³use BGP-LS to send EAG just like we already send AG², why not
> >just
> >|      fold this content into bgp-ls?  The reason it¹s not in bgp-ls
> >already
> >|      is ­ I  suspect ­ just  a matter  of timing between  EAG and
> >bgp-ls
> >|      publication.
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|      eric
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|      From: Idr [[6]mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of wangzitao
> >|      Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:04 PM
> >|      To: [7][e-mail]
> >|      Cc: Hares Susan
> >|      Subject: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|      Hi, folks:
> >|
> >|      We have  submitted  a new  short  draft  to discuss  BGP
> >extension  for
> >|      Extended admin Group
> >|
> >|
> >| [8]https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
> >|
> >|      and requested a timeslot to present it at IETF91.
> >|
> >|      Please help review and comment on this short draft.
> >|
> >|      Thanks in advance.
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|      Regards!
> >|
> >|      -Michael
> >|
> >| References
> >|
> >|    Visible links
> >|    1. mailto:[e-mail]
> >|    2. mailto:[e-mail]
> >|    3. mailto:[e-mail]
> >|    4. mailto:[e-mail]
> >|    5. mailto:[e-mail]
> >|    6. mailto:[e-mail]
> >|    7. mailto:[e-mail]
> >|    8. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
> >
> >| _______________________________________________
> >| Idr mailing list
> >| [e-mail]
> >| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Idr mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr