IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00

"Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)" <bduvivie@cisco.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bduvivie@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12421A1A02 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s00efocQtksn for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282581A1A53 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3293; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414693135; x=1415902735; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=oL7wSz9s9Xg1Jx71n9NwjZxAmeBfXqcCg+fTOOo6xYQ=; b=eAetYmO5Pk/ClHIQaYnGuvj4lA5CuuodDWrkghYflM+s9D6wYhH/g68h wgIy+6DnxlVL/g4x6S5s17P/sVFuU0rWDaa7mANF7oINqlGh7FEV3cE6F y/S2akOlJEK+v1yI2miC4JLbdDh76bTHC3tKzsQ6dYOwhUxQCTNKWcw2K s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiAFAKWAUlStJA2I/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNEQqHTQKBJBYBAQEBAX2EAgEBAQQBAQFrCwwEAgEIEQMBAQEBCh0HJwsUCQgCBAENBQiIOQ3KOwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEkF4GKwcGgyeBHgWLLoZihEqIR4NKkUmDeGyBSIEDAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,287,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="364841503"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2014 18:18:36 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9UIIaER013052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:18:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.58]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:18:36 -0500
From: "Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)" <bduvivie@cisco.com>
To: "Jan Medved (jmedved)" <jmedved@cisco.com>, Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
Thread-Index: AQHP8tq71gzDGOJbXEecaEL53TvHU5xIlN8AgAA7YgCAACMZIA==
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:18:35 +0000
Message-ID: <5F1FD493E541C642ABBC18EDC327C82F1FF52148@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com>
References: <D07528C7.771FD%jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> <20141030073030.GE19169@hannes-mba.local> <D077CB41.8C7F1%jmedved@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D077CB41.8C7F1%jmedved@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.149.0.147]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rr72H1h3_fnkjWlF9BkQVZ8j2Y8
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:19:03 -0000

Agree, 

Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier


-----Original Message-----
From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jan Medved (jmedved)
Sent: jeudi 30 octobre 2014 19:03
To: Hannes Gredler; Jeff Tantsura
Cc: idr@ietf.org; Hares Susan
Subject: Re: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00

+1

bgp-ls is in the WG last call, let¹s not restart that clock.


Thanks,
Jan


On 10/30/14, 12:30 AM, "Hannes Gredler" <hannes@juniper.net> wrote:

>real question is:
>
>do we want to close BGP-LS base spec and submit it to IESG or leave it 
>open as an eternal draft ? - IMO EAG is a useful thing hence vendors 
>will be adding support for this, but can perfectly live as a standalone 
>document,
>
>/hannes
>
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 06:12:28PM +0000, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>|    Hi Eric,
>|    Agree, should be treated same way as AG and included in bgp-ls,
>|    Extended Administrative Group with TLV code point 1099
>|    Cheers,
>|    Jeff
>|    From: <Osborne>, Eric <[1]eric.osborne@level3.com>
>|    Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 at 6:48 AM
>|    To: wangzitao <[2]wangzitao@huawei.com>, "[3]idr@ietf.org"
>|    <[4]idr@ietf.org>
>|    Cc: Hares Susan <[5]shares@ndzh.com>
>|    Subject: Re: [Idr] New version of 
>| draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
>| 
>|      I skimmed it and it  looks reasonable.  Given  that it really 
>| just
> says
>|      ³use BGP-LS to send EAG just like we already send AG², why not
>just
>|      fold this content into bgp-ls?  The reason it¹s not in bgp-ls
>already
>|      is ­ I  suspect ­ just  a matter  of timing between  EAG and
>bgp-ls
>|      publication.
>| 
>| 
>| 
>| 
>| 
>| 
>| 
>| 
>| 
>|      eric
>| 
>| 
>| 
>|      From: Idr [[6]mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of wangzitao
>|      Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:04 PM
>|      To: [7]idr@ietf.org
>|      Cc: Hares Susan
>|      Subject: [Idr] New version of draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
>| 
>| 
>| 
>|      Hi, folks:
>| 
>|      We have  submitted  a new  short  draft  to discuss  BGP
>extension  for
>|      Extended admin Group
>| 
>|      
>| [8]https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
>| 
>|      and requested a timeslot to present it at IETF91.
>| 
>|      Please help review and comment on this short draft.
>| 
>|      Thanks in advance.
>| 
>| 
>| 
>|      Regards!
>| 
>|      -Michael
>| 
>| References
>| 
>|    Visible links
>|    1. mailto:eric.osborne@level3.com
>|    2. mailto:wangzitao@huawei.com
>|    3. mailto:idr@ietf.org
>|    4. mailto:idr@ietf.org
>|    5. mailto:shares@ndzh.com
>|    6. mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org
>|    7. mailto:idr@ietf.org
>|    8. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-00
>
>| _______________________________________________
>| Idr mailing list
>| Idr@ietf.org
>| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email