IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-jakma-mrai-dep-00 (fwd)

"Bhatia, Manav \(Manav\)" <manav@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 26 November 2008 04:48 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031DD3A67A5; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:48:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966353A67A5 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:48:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MvtTqPdwm1DW for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:48:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0BD3A67A1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:48:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ilexp03.ndc.lucent.com (h135-3-39-50.lucent.com [135.3.39.50]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id mAQ4mU34019091; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:48:30 -0600 (CST)
Received: from inexp02.in.lucent.com ([135.254.223.66]) by ilexp03.ndc.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:48:30 -0600
Received: from INEXC1U01.in.lucent.com ([135.254.223.25]) by inexp02.in.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:18:28 +0530
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:18:25 +0530
Message-ID: <6D26D1FE43A66F439F8109CDD42419650235676A@INEXC1U01.in.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081126042010.GA14608@slice>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-jakma-mrai-dep-00 (fwd)
thread-index: AclPfmBqk/iNpQiKR6m4x8c9BvaVzwAAGV7A
References: <200811252329.mAPNTTM46473@magenta.juniper.net><20081126001652.GB12535@slice><200811260140.mAQ1eXM09692@magenta.juniper.net> <20081126042010.GA14608@slice>
From: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2008 04:48:28.0346 (UTC) FILETIME=[395C41A0:01C94F82]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
Cc: idr <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-jakma-mrai-dep-00 (fwd)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

 
Jeff,

> By this, do you mean you don't believe that MRAI should be separately
> configurable for reachability and unreachability?
> 
> If so, could you recount the gist of your conversation with Pedro?

The argument was that its impossible for BGP to differentiate between a
good/bad event as either can result in a UPDATE or a WITHDRAWN be sent.
A link going down could result in a new BGP UPDATE (an implicit
withdrawal), while a link coming up could result in a WITHDRAWN to be
sent. So, how do you decide what needs to be sent fast or slow.

Cheers, Manav

> 
> -- Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email