IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-scudder-idr-entropy-label-01 (9/6/2022 to 9/20/2022)

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Wed, 28 September 2022 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08DAC1527A1 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pFvQjGlitOV for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (mail-m121145.qiye.163.com [115.236.121.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1B96C14CF17 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [221.223.103.237]) by mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 68C0D80006C; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:23:42 +0800 (CST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-35A3E84F-DDF6-4EC8-BADC-E34C60095D2B"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:23:41 +0800
Message-Id: <5245E2DE-6D17-4ED3-94DD-44E55D2008CD@tsinghua.org.cn>
References: <BYAPR08MB48721FE4114EA8C33BA893FDB3559@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR08MB48721FE4114EA8C33BA893FDB3559@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G82)
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkaGkhNVhodQxofHh1PGksaGFUTARMWGhIXJB QOD1lXWRgSC1lBWUlJSlVJSUhVSktIVUlITFlXWRYaDxIVHRRZQVlPS0hVSkpLSE1KVUpLS1VLWQ Y+
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6PC46Oio6IT0hNg4JMhFPSSkY NUMaCjlVSlVKTU1PSElPTUlJTExDVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSUpVSUlIVUpLSFVJSExZV1kIAVlBTUxIQzcG
X-HM-Tid: 0a83817a5860b03akuuu68c0d80006c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/fsgpAk5OOp6c5rbc3U0sT3LCxP4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-scudder-idr-entropy-label-01 (9/6/2022 to 9/20/2022)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:23:50 -0000

Hi, Sue:

Want to ask where are the consensus on the list for this draft? Given this draft has contradicted with the existing WG draft which has been pointed out by several several service providers?
As also mentioned in your list questions, there is necessary to discuss the short term and long term improvements of BGP next hop in the coming interim meeting, then what’s the reason to adopt this document in hurry?

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> On Sep 28, 2022, at 01:14, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> The chairs have reviewed the IDR WG discussion and feedback from implementers on draft-ietf-idr-entropy-label-01.txt.
>                                              
> The consensus from this review is that we should:
> 1) adopt draft-scudder-idr-entropy-label-01 as
> draft-ietf-idr-entropy-label-01  
>  
>  
> 2) Hold a discussion of BGP Next-Hop technology to discuss
> the needs for current and future standards on BGP Next Hop.
>  
> During this interim we will discuss the open proposals for
> BGP Next HOPS to determine what technology goes forward
> toward standardization.
>  
> IDR needs the feedback from implementers and operators
> about the short term and long-term improvements to
> BGP Next hop.
>  
> Cheerily, Sue  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email