IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4812C1A1A36 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PkTYxxTuhAA9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C831A1A29 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1761; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414162895; x=1415372495; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7nwtbYeGQYtiduGtYNNdJZ35hWzya2y5GHkz3sTwUGk=; b=lTR2VZFLP8xGdFR4IU0CfshzHiToVebqHBqJqi0318GXHrPNQuc3Sn3a hTMluGq11/r6jal30+Nz7oQRTz3wP6aMFKtj295SQBopmhwBOkMOcNO9J tOCOZ4zLyLqLh0w/zPVc7TtV+5CbC7L+ndOp7UonX8AyvIUD6K3+q59Sq o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMFAHtpSlStJA2F/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNHwqHTQKBBxYBfYQDAQEEAQEBNzQbAgEIDgoeECcLJQIEARKIQQ3JYwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARYEkF+ESwWSBYRGhxKBMYZ2hmaHH4N4bIFIgQMBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,780,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="90028659"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 15:01:34 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OF1YRk031341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:01:34 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.122]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:01:34 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHP75Kap4Z9K+zxD0OU3icqROzTNZw/n5SA///I1oA=
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:01:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D06FE1A9.675B%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20141024135742.19022.17526.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20141024141859.GF30433@pfrc>
In-Reply-To: <20141024141859.GF30433@pfrc>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.202]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <376E587E18838846B5EFEFFDDEA5E161@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/fzZRdbVj3OfegcUDT25JMWSIU38
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:01:53 -0000

I just reread it for the first time in a couple years and would agree that
it is ready for WG last call.
Thanks,
Acee

On 10/24/14, 10:18 AM, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

>The update below addressed the major open issue that remained for the
>feature, as deployed, to match the spec: The behavior for ebgp has been
>moved out of operation and into deployment considerations.
>
>I'm not an author, but I believe this draft is finally read for a
>hopefully
>short Working Group Last Call.
>
>-- Jeff
>
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:57:42AM -0700, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>directories.
>>  This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of
>>the IETF.
>> 
>>         Title           : Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP
>>         Authors         : Daniel Walton
>>                           Alvaro Retana
>>                           Enke Chen
>>                           John Scudder
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt
>> 	Pages           : 8
>> 	Date            : 2014-10-24
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>    In this document we propose a BGP extension that allows the
>>    advertisement of multiple paths for the same address prefix without
>>    the new paths implicitly replacing any previous ones.  The essence of
>>    the extension is that each path is identified by a path identifier in
>>    addition to the address prefix.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-add-paths/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email