Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt

Shouldn't we have an implementation report draft documenting those details
before WG last call on the main draft ?

r.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie) <
bduvivie@cisco.com> wrote:

> Acee, Jeff,
>
> To be more precise for Cisco we already support it in our 3 OS's
> - IOS XE and IOS classic (CPE and Access routing platform OS)
> - IOS XR (hig-end routing platform OS)
> - NXOS (switching platform OS)
> And interoperability have been tested between Cisco OS's, with Juniper
> JUNOS, and few others
>
> Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier
> IP routing Product Manager
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bertrand Duvivier
> (bduvivie)
> Sent: vendredi 24 octobre 2014 17:49
> To: Acee Lindem (acee); Jeffrey Haas; idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt
>
> Agree, has been implemented in many OS's already
>
> Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier
> IP routing Product Manager
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
> Sent: vendredi 24 octobre 2014 17:02
> To: Jeffrey Haas; idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt
>
> I just reread it for the first time in a couple years and would agree that
> it is ready for WG last call.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 10/24/14, 10:18 AM, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
>
> >The update below addressed the major open issue that remained for the
> >feature, as deployed, to match the spec: The behavior for ebgp has been
> >moved out of operation and into deployment considerations.
> >
> >I'm not an author, but I believe this draft is finally read for a
> >hopefully short Working Group Last Call.
> >
> >-- Jeff
> >
> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:57:42AM -0700, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >>directories.
> >>  This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group
> >>of the IETF.
> >>
> >>         Title           : Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP
> >>         Authors         : Daniel Walton
> >>                           Alvaro Retana
> >>                           Enke Chen
> >>                           John Scudder
> >>      Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-10.txt
> >>      Pages           : 8
> >>      Date            : 2014-10-24
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>    In this document we propose a BGP extension that allows the
> >>    advertisement of multiple paths for the same address prefix without
> >>    the new paths implicitly replacing any previous ones.  The essence of
> >>    the extension is that each path is identified by a path identifier in
> >>    addition to the address prefix.
> >>
> >>
> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-add-paths/
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Idr mailing list
> >Idr@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>