Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 13 February 2015 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A59F1A8702 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 06:18:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.054
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOoyO6f2QeFF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 06:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41211A86FB for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 06:18:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.92;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Shitanshu Shah (svshah)'" <svshah@cisco.com>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
References: <050701d03405$cd9836d0$68c8a470$@ndzh.com> <D0E3DEB9.A993%svshah@cisco.com> <024c01d034e7$aee7a210$0cb6e630$@ndzh.com> <D10292C3.CDCB%svshah@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D10292C3.CDCB%svshah@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:18:40 -0500
Message-ID: <0afb01d04797$f7384c00$e5a8e400$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0AFC_01D0476E.0E63A390"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJtp6va5v9ej5Bykj+yKjPQJ5I1JALVfpyFAy9LtZgBRlDkdpt5h5dw
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/kWUHKpywYWKTvJWgwC-i3E9hJSA>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:18:57 -0000

Shitanshu: 

 

Can you give a reference for the ExaBGP implementation or an explanation on
list?  I'm not familiar with that implementation. 

 

Sue 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shitanshu Shah (svshah)
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:29 PM
To: Susan Hares; 'idr wg'
Cc: 'John G. Scudder'
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04
(2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

 

 

Implementation and inter-operability results are documented at,

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-svshah-idr-sla-exchange-impl-02.tx
t

 

The inter-operability is tested between 2 Cisco OS implementations as well
with ExaBGP implementation.

 

Regards,

Shitanshu

 

From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM
To: svshah <svshah@cisco.com>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: RE: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04
(2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

 

Shitanshu:

 

This is great news about the 2 interoperability implementations. Please send
the results over your inter-operability tests to the idr list. 

 

Sue 

 

From: Shitanshu Shah (svshah) [mailto:svshah@cisco.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:34 PM
To: Susan Hares; idr wg
Cc: 'John G. Scudder'
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04
(2/19/2015 rto 2/5/2015)

 

 

There does not exist any IPR for this draft AFAIK.

 

With respect to 2 implementations, we are currently in the process of
validating inter-operability of 2 implementations.

 

Regards,

Shitanshu

 

From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Monday, January 19, 2015 at 8:34 AM
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-04 (2/19/2015
rto 2/5/2015)

 

 

This is to begin a 2 week Wg LC for draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange.   Please
comment on the usefulness of the draft in deployments and on the technical
pros/cons of the draft.  In your comments please include:  "support" or "no
support" indicate.  Authors should indicate if any IPR exists for this
draft, and the number of implementations that exist. 

 

If this draft does not have 2 implementations, it will go to a state of WG
LC completed, awaiting 2 implementations. 

 

The draft can be found at: 

 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange/

 

Sue Hares