IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Slot request in IDR to present https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-idr-bgp-route-refresh-options-00.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 19 July 2016 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFF212D591 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9bFJrGb7Cmp for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F5112D626 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x1so13615627qkb.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=omHFBfCxegTjICaMJHFppLquP3ejhsICktDCxCA+IY4=; b=FI9TUsQeMO3a2nweOD9S4VU8KcpmUTNAduavejWPby+E0gZ98R+avsfl+Rdok5M/aE 28TK4r3sennEXqm/9cE4Pwc/TO74uQFUDUVYpS/+srh2rNB42JcFL87aBIwoZnIXe25d YnwuGZbT5ttfLIMEemPcsWlc+TaIKjDc3+0oOSOztG3QY6IMS8Z1APJi1mRHIv0gtbkn wrnUadlyJG8P+bF5Lg7EfJLRllNjoDMDI3GkwOwBC+EsqI5tpcBnzzfcA+OV+MiA4uyO +K4FdGQNQ8UcoqESEmyNJh4ifKhruZRLojUZ9+e2lmIqVvlscjXz26Mq6rtTsLHHynu/ R0YA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=omHFBfCxegTjICaMJHFppLquP3ejhsICktDCxCA+IY4=; b=SHOjGeZ7H5pzDT+/iQjkgXA/Nm2mbGVRN5QIKxmQYGjMVZ6Mor2mRkRrbY7QZ3IObX jXN1uhh35zQFhcCiQ3/rpaf9dIgv1YR7S8khA1C794y5xYgGo1lttYTmMlDQTBUen6Cg I1YREUl6/2mt8k7cL4+Gcqyc4tCJoQJZ2+dUQBTSQoTCPhnjJaaeWjXAier88Ln8tygK Cyu68yhmwvdYoMhECWoMxEuhF4x4uWDylsS5dQuMVJKQ7a0og3Q7A3zilqMwQMX3/YPZ 4VXiCISI6Wq/Ngk4AdSwWXCwotyRD9WDs2GwoI5Ukohj5th2t+I5t02ng3SdTA2hxnBB Dn9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI3Jl2wZtlw2d8dv0/YnVViGOjjavliW0Tti34a8eB6Ux6IcFEI5Ndfk8ip1UiR5L1WIsPQMqZAp5wyoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.16.27 with SMTP id a27mr53777438qkh.34.1468931081054; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.36.90 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.237.36.90 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hPwc=oELuhQpXdEnOAVycn3XRhKZWvJLt6QptRxHCa-2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+wi2hM+y_K+_50Q_QRS64VBdzgBWtx8hL-6iepsVqed+NtqTw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm2AnRAYeJRDdsAh=hLX81aQUTVd7Pe5PYLpWmHNvbgtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hMsbVetW_D+HpsdXEHyh75yZkx+QTpj+FoX2hMTcqbrzw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hNk2+GLY0G800Uo8qgdZQWh=9AzFGhZTk+fWRd6isgriw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hPwc=oELuhQpXdEnOAVycn3XRhKZWvJLt6QptRxHCa-2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:24:40 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: kwcEnCwYh1vyG_bZBRNKGUJcXiE
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=+EPeD94TYxEuDYP7rqeLb2RREWQavGENWiG6u5THXDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11476366492fd70537fc2b5f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/lQg8KlWgS3OAG3JVL8G9PySeimE>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Slot request in IDR to present https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-idr-bgp-route-refresh-options-00.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:24:46 -0000

Tony,

Section 7.9 only mentions that RD *MAY BE* structured to include VLAN ID
but equally well it says  that it may be locally generated.

As someone pointed at this IETF term "MAY" = "MAY NOT" hence any actions
based on that is likely to fail.

Said this while perhaps someone can use your RD type to manually query the
peer for subset of routes then for any automated action .. which is what is
really need say when you modify RT import list it will fail.

Bottom line I think we should not add elements to protocols which are not
guaranteed to work if for nothing else then to reduce operational issues in
multi vendor environments.

Thx
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email