Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <> Mon, 05 August 2019 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8032120162 for <>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 08:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5c1N84nQqUSZ for <>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 08:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA4DF1200F3 for <>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x75FS8Ie031225; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:28:08 +0100
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211802204A; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:28:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C13A22044; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:28:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x75FS6b0020434 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:28:07 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <>
Cc: 'Susan Hares' <>
References: <1564187800_127314@FUMC-WEB2>
In-Reply-To: <1564187800_127314@FUMC-WEB2>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 16:28:05 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <046501d54ba2$6169da90$243d8fb0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0466_01D54BAA.C32F7B10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJvTEh2NHNBE/LYRGjWRWL5tc4N/aW4qw4A
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--17.694-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--17.694-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--17.694200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: PL66URbwWA9or4mPA3EMtnFPUrVDm6jtHj2mH3YAudNXPwnnY5XL5E1z o9VwQLtwbxJoGe5odID7m+/RLgauW2UksqykCGSHwY28o+cGA5rNCiBItkSKfybATuyA+032Vdr VvjGE5WFC3bjvSDu958PBJFzUCjAbnI0XI2bmVlmyBjDX4sGuTUpl/9BUBA/Y+S5C/08hWc2957 xA59m16TGJw1TMiWU71nEhY+wJBiq+uljmlfSJ34XeW3MZzu0731asM/gsp2kYDu7Ahk0dDVxfz 10OsXj5iZmfBZYgGr+/LUPnfvvbV2H39wOZ1o5GIf0TE1VduNsZ8RJ4fqmXhkdmDSBYfnJR2jgV mhKlDxgWtSCqtMvi9usXJB8Y+irlFKSQtYPsb9ckO5bN+/P8x3s0iNyjUNXyDC/Vm90If4V0NOB 2+sLcHpJJRUf02ZTRJIVdEtqJTGzsxr0ZiyQynwezB6GJ6zMhK+epgkjf/Duyy072phvASaPFjJ EFr+ol6AvlZUR4TshZZmMIUsIQGlOm2gN+nomsIG4YlbCDECu3mwjnNrzR656Z8W5DNes9Zr44+ qNKda9VrCGMgcwPR32iE4PcIig3aAZk0sEcY14=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:28:13 -0000

Hi WG,


I just want to rattle the bars of the cage a bit, here.


John (reliably) informs me that he had a number of conversations about the BGP-LS registries and their allocation policies: people (it seems) wanted more-relaxed rules.


It is possible that the advocates are the authors of the set of drafts that have just been pushed forward for “early allocation” and so no one cares any more.


Or it is possible that everyone is too busy.


Or, perhaps, no one wants these changes.





From: Idr <> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 27 July 2019 01:37
Subject: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt


This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt.


Let the discussion begin and in midst of your comments please remember to include "support" or "no support".



Adrian enjoy the discussion.


Cheerily  Sue




Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone