IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC - draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nvo3-12 - Technology only (2/4/2020 to 2/18/2020).

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C673A115F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:11:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o8d4p_2n7o1Y for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3FEB3A1160 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id q5so1234129ilc.10 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:11:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FytOg0cf0U6VczOja2w+dQSecZ586FnUi/JWVHLVEzU=; b=aAWxWkF7UJ9oeUyTjHR9Mjf93K9ec6hCkp/k+ZbSmBuz3uqKP/6BAAWGfv+NmrPl8V /Abpq58xUjTWBTALeUB8owlhFkLg989UECRF93yJV0Tnkh0Fb6U3SIWcWLo419qniCPp fQWVPVC6teUNR6My6I+kJbsUqcj1a8zzHM9ddCE0axzzNcr/Cf6yqt8NLkVywi9XATW2 WegeFEdk91CxxrhkJAeZRjuxSebQIEJSun23AD6f1PwL5wRHHpvbEtA8R2RXQHW63xDM zDv2lQSUZp8opafTBEXBomkgGQb3vCcK5tNZ2CKpdRz+dodmfDlarXMpMJdajTOKtFco uB8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FytOg0cf0U6VczOja2w+dQSecZ586FnUi/JWVHLVEzU=; b=D9l/L3WYVo8LMOBMM5LDVelYv4IzZL/egZNz0tZEEFzjaFPM0w6bl2R3G8l/ZhoPZ4 c8e/NKtdlzXIEFiNAIAuVj9gZon5iaamc+rBY+9fSI7O40IiBKybaEelgNO3cru/CqId c9ENM1dQ05jL1hN4LhcUJn/M2S6QDnrprKSItREMAmoV8OSFPXv47fm6T0NWmNSPa0H+ Vv36FUop4ySDxI03clbXUA3xqS9bjvLr4m159BrFhvUOrVVCwNBwTKKxr9giOUwaHI6U tnyiC/yo3g6MCzwA+sELG9bu1zqz904nbB8fje/12U8i+L+N3oGos8zN0DpkbjQ4ipxY 8UeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Q475oNfeim2sBSpDhWUXjXC62ZREa+WGNqtetJl5feNAEdAxN AfE0dFDBLn1j+NjvojrXiXC4kYxUeg5Iy2tO5lMdbQmfAxFDuw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHPv1aGWPQLy49oyqZ/m56Bs1HFtf36sFGAa7+hoQB+pwsgWY5rPTgFUa9opY+zIlKccNqCfhh4LLTwVm7b7A=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d790:: with SMTP id d16mr3372961iln.124.1613650290040; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:11:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <012d01d6fb0d$b50468c0$1f0d3a40$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <012d01d6fb0d$b50468c0$1f0d3a40$@ndzh.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:40:53 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4n1wV0ut+wo5B261nhve7+8h2h+Zr-xD25hx4tOfidvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/q8SyNSUrq6UKIoL-YwCtjByCMuU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC - draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nvo3-12 - Technology only (2/4/2020 to 2/18/2020).
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:11:32 -0000

Hi,

I have read the draft and found it clear and concise and ready for
publication. Is there any extra security consideration because of
tunneled traffic? Even if none, it might be useful to add some
analysis text!

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:22 PM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings:
>
>
>
> This begins a modified draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nvo3-12.txt.
>
>
>
> It is a modified WG LC because:
>
> 1) the WG still has to discussion where we make the cutoff for flow-specification v2,
>
> 2) there are no implementation for this WG LC
>
>
>
> This WG LC should examine the following things:
>
>
>
> 1.) Does WG to standardize this technology with
>
>     the IPR Statement (which appeared in 5/8/2020 after a modification of the draft)?
>
>
>
> 2) Is this approach to flow-specification for tunnels ready for standardization?
>
>
>
> 3) Would this technology inter-work with tunnels created by
>
>  draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap-22.txt?
>
>
>
> 4) Should this technology wait for a flow-specification v2?
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Sue
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email