IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] WG LC - draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nvo3-12 - Technology only (2/4/2020 to 2/18/2020).

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 04 February 2021 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B1D3A15F0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:52:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.347
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0yzEeGgkj8Kr for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB453A15EF for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:52:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.97.127;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:52:14 -0500
Message-ID: <012d01d6fb0d$b50468c0$1f0d3a40$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_012E_01D6FAE3.CC2F2410"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Adb7DbR5Y6uqWQ3FTgWkA6IBSWvxMg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210204-6, 02/04/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qZK5UeZnp27ecbIcgA9EhOdEs4g>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC - draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nvo3-12 - Technology only (2/4/2020 to 2/18/2020).
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:52:19 -0000

Greetings: 

 

This begins a modified draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nvo3-12.txt. 

 

It is a modified WG LC because:

1) the WG still has to discussion where we make the cutoff for
flow-specification v2, 

2) there are no implementation for this WG LC

 

This WG LC should examine the following things: 

 

1.) Does WG to standardize this technology with 

    the IPR Statement (which appeared in 5/8/2020 after a modification of
the draft)? 

 

2) Is this approach to flow-specification for tunnels ready for
standardization?

 

3) Would this technology inter-work with tunnels created by 

 draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encap-22.txt? 

 

4) Should this technology wait for a flow-specification v2? 

 

Cheerily, Sue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email