[Idr] RFC 5575 flow-spec traffic-rate non-transitive?
"Hyojeong Kim (hyojekim)" <hyojekim@cisco.com> Fri, 14 June 2013 23:08 UTC
Return-Path: <hyojekim@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E9021E8083 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2hDQELUm9Qm for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD4021E805D for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1588; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1371251328; x=1372460928; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=hnyByAI5Xy14Txj/0zY+dw5dyBMj03zOyaRh8QSXkUI=; b=IZ1Ow5Rh/LzblstdVQqwfyZGiT5/LCyFFfBz43jXvQzdBHMfnYponBF+ NJAIOAVZuBkBp7d1nzepmUKOmowlxFPznk6N/0uo2vrTKAc8kcOXbXNps Px2KH4VRSnkr6gEIcwmLbh+TOOHwkIiYHcibi4jBDQsZ9DObiW9QTOt8I Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am8GAH6hu1GtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgkUjIXm+RoEMFm0HghoLAQSBCwELAR5WJwQbDId5AQGZbaAdjxeDN2EDqQODD4Io
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,868,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="222861363"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2013 23:08:48 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5EN8mNx030411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:08:48 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:08:47 -0500
From: "Hyojeong Kim (hyojekim)" <hyojekim@cisco.com>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC 5575 flow-spec traffic-rate non-transitive?
Thread-Index: AQHOaVQfQ7Dxq1pvkEWy+Yv65iPEXg==
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:08:47 +0000
Message-ID: <BB7BDBA82647F94A81FE5689A3D2A728123980E4@xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.1.120420
x-originating-ip: [171.71.139.221]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BB7BDBA82647F94A81FE5689A3D2A728123980E4xmbalnx13ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Idr] RFC 5575 flow-spec traffic-rate non-transitive?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:08:54 -0000
According to RFC 5575, the type of traffic-rate is 0x8006 and its transitive bit is 0. However, it is mentioned that "the traffic-rate extended community is a non-transitive extended community across the autonomous-system boundary". Is this indeed the case where we should not honor the transitive bit? Thanks, Hyojeong
- [Idr] RFC 5575 flow-spec traffic-rate non-transit… Hyojeong Kim (hyojekim)