Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] multicast over wifi and and IEEE-IETF coordination

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 05 November 2015 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7185F1B3BAC for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:48:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R86KQqjQfZlP for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:48:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6917D1B3BAD for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451BB880E5; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-24-158.meeting.ietf94.jp (unknown [133.93.24.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35727328081A; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:48:01 -0800 (PST)
To: "Toerless Eckert (eckert)" <eckert@cisco.com>
References: <20151104004558.GJ31730@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511040151520.15542@uplift.swm.pp.se> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BE807E6@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <d4a7a943d65c4536a986641491e41cf4@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BE8486C@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <563AEDE7.2050501@innovationslab.net> <20151105055721.GS31730@cisco.com>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <563B09A9.4090200@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 02:47:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151105055721.GS31730@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i8h6mjTXruUknUmww88x5sKhEP1Dn0eR2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/jSNkGeVXVVhHkZ0OJ3dYPs7am9o>
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org" <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] multicast over wifi and and IEEE-IETF coordination
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 07:48:05 -0000

Hi Toerless,
     To this point, the discussion has been focused on 802.11. I think
the IEEE folks would be in the position to talk about any other
multicast-capable 802 wireless technologies that should be considered at
the same time.

Regards,
Brian

On 11/5/15 12:57 AM, Toerless Eckert (eckert) wrote:
> One thought i am not sure about:
> 
> Are all the wireless networks of interest in the IETF use link-layer defined
> by IEEE ? Would like to make sure we have this discussion once and for all,
> anf that we don't solve it once eg: for 802.11 and then unnecessary reinvent
> that wheel later on for some other challenged link-layer technology.
> 
> Cheers
>     Toerless
> 
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 12:49:27AM -0500, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> I mentioned this to most of the people explicitly included on this note.
>>  JC and Suresh are going to request a non-wg mailing list for this
>> topic. Once I approve it, a broad announcement will be sent out so that
>> everyone interested can join.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>>
>> On 11/5/15 12:36 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>>> Hi Pascal,
>>>
>>> I am changing the distribution list of this message adding the ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org mail list and taking out int-area, 6lo, 6man, mboned to avoid too much cross-posting. 
>>>
>>> I am interested in opinions from other participants in the IETF-IEEE 802 coordination activities. 
>>>
>>> Note that a BOF usually takes place within IETF meeting hours, but has a list of conflicts that can include the relevant WGs in the INT (and other) areas. 
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) [mailto:pthubert@cisco.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 5:22 AM
>>>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Mikael Abrahamsson; Toerless Eckert (eckert)
>>>> Cc: mboned@ietf.org; 6man@ietf.org; int-area@ietf.org; 6lo@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: RE: multicast over wifi and and IEEE-IETF coordination
>>>>
>>>> Hello Dan,
>>>>
>>>> I'd see it useful to give this a lot of visibility and accessibility. A BoF-type
>>>> meeting outside of meeting hours at this or the next IETF would probably
>>>> improve that piece. INTAREA has collisions that people did not necessarily get
>>>> a chance to manage in advance so interested people may miss the
>>>> presentation.
>>>> I would like to be sure that most interested parties have a chance to know
>>>> that this is happening at all.
>>>>
>>>> Some of these discussion will relate to work happening at various WGs. Out
>>>> of my hat and not copied above I see at least 6lo and MANET which deal with
>>>> radios networks and need efficient network and service discovery. Cc ing 6lo
>>>> because this is where RFC 6775 originated, and new work is taking place.
>>>>
>>>> There will be serious discussions, and probably documents produced in the
>>>> form of best practices. This work may deserve a short-termed WG on its
>>>> own. A non-Wg forming BoF would help figure all that out.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Pascal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan
>>>>> (Dan)
>>>>> Sent: mercredi 4 novembre 2015 10:52
>>>>> To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>; Toerless Eckert (eckert)
>>>>> <eckert@cisco.com>
>>>>> Cc: mboned@ietf.org; 6man@ietf.org; int-area@ietf.org
>>>>> Subject: RE: multicast over wifi and and IEEE-IETF coordination
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anybody believe there is a better/other place to go with this
>>>>> information?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mikael
>>>>>> Abrahamsson
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 2:57 AM
>>>>>> To: Toerless Eckert
>>>>>> Cc: mboned@ietf.org; 6man@ietf.org; int-area@ietf.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: multicast over wifi and and IEEE-IETF coordination
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [sorry, resending with correct email aliases]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mikael:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any reason to choose INTAREA ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't choose anything, INTAREA was chosen by the people in the
>>>>>> coordination group that includes several ADs. The multicast over
>>>>>> wifi issue has been raised in multiple working groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is already a draft in mboned:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> draft-mcbride-mboned-wifi-mcast-problem-statement-00.txt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and... mboned runs in parallel to intarea this time *sigh* and...
>>>>>>> i am sure mboned participants would love to hear your preso about
>>>> IEEE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So thanks for including mboned so that people there are aware that
>>>>>> this is discussed in INTAREA. MBONED is not alone in having
>>>>>> conflicts with INTAREA, there are other low-power wireless
>>>>>> technology people who also have conflicts. Please discuss this issue
>>>>>> on the INTAREA mailing list, and you can watch the presentation
>>>>>> (it's not mine) after the fact on for instance Meetecho. I don't
>>>>>> believe there is much time for discussion in the INTAREA meeting,
>>>>>> they have a packed agenda already if I
>>>>> understood correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative
>>>>>> Requests:
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>>>>>>
>>>>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ipv6&d=BQICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl
>>>>> 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=aVouzp
>>>>> b
>>>>>> CzgpDGMb8eabFNhiZ61AnoK06iltaK1NwjdE&s=cleQzxju-
>>>>>> 9RBGYIarDCVTKq1uzL_2XAW0kgXpVNreiw&e=
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>>>> Administrative Requests:
>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>>>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mail
>>>>>
>>>> man_listinfo_ipv6&d=BQIFAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31O
>>>> cNXCJf
>>>>> QzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=qHpFubkmi1a9pmAjISJ0EjvA8NUQGZ-
>>>> _B2CzehRj
>>>>> RWI&s=qMDWr1zTfue9QcQlTCqqdsNKOBXFtU8JacB48j4AifE&e=
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ieee-ietf-coord mailing list
>>> ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord
>>>
>>
> 
> 
>