Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Updating the IESG statement on IEEE EtherTypes

["Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Éric,

Thanks for taking care of this.

It is a nit, but I guess the upper case “T” for EtherType should also be used in the title. Otherwise, it looks fine to me.

Best,

Juan-Carlos

From: ieee-ietf-coord <[e-mail]> on behalf of Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, April 21, 2023 at 08:19
To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, Juan Carlos Zuniga <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] Updating the IESG statement on IEEE EtherTypes
Dear IESG,
Dear Donald (author of rfc6042bis),
Dear int-area WG chairs,
Dear IEEE-IETF coordination,

Based on the recent IEEE liaison statement [1] about rfc6042bis[2] , I have drafted an updated IESG statement [3] with the trivial changes about IEEE EtherTypes:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13N_9uwTNCnf8ZlzPeEUuAkOgqhvaBJsUSee4E5ENFw8/edit?usp=sharing

Would you mind reviewing those changes ?

If everyone agrees, then let's minute the approval during the IESG telechat on Thursday 27th of April and update the IESG statement.

Thanks in advance,

-éric

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1823<https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1823/>
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis/
[3] https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/ethertypes/