IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-01.txt

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 08 October 2020 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8B73A0D9B for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=YkQVWRNK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=qDy47KpL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_SxrrYFIE4q for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD28C3A0D9A for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 475 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2020 02:11:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1d8.5f7e753f.k2010; bh=f+RXwoSmVwE9EgyF0nPRal4g6tCAsK8ue+mFGUfHhQU=; b=YkQVWRNK9jT5IFPAqaRXdRmsB1LSsEllZuxHYmPjZdXXOWMriC15TNj1X2Mo5nVLLmkENTNROo+5Qsv60cRtIkACBVW1bQA9iYCRuOOseFH9VDZ199QXpo6HBPuef4etNM/NSCrOeOnMXFr9pphpQsLlS9qqB8Hb3RppHMGR8BJNd4B4yL6xxvMHgLU4m2e3HWznhDs9k6awfNBMv6djeJ1bja//sUp8x53r2Ncsxb0gLQnKcIlyisgiUBoffsl94xcd3A1i1WnT/y5UU1vGfS/OgnPqRQAS458HPzynj0QgUsyNGbrVuCn+D61sCGehAJ+PxblDuBE2T3KYhUbP+w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1d8.5f7e753f.k2010; bh=f+RXwoSmVwE9EgyF0nPRal4g6tCAsK8ue+mFGUfHhQU=; b=qDy47KpL3VaPkGEW+csqenGxgagRx4sQP16t3COJ5a4m0Ofc8g4g2AlK7IQjJvCOqyfK+URJLERE4z1HVJ4xkihHl3nIWQsKXQQq7Rc7VtIuVqxr5241zhPd3QtegCgBaXwdIaGSK9yJQ42eLjt2OE6Vui8Owoq8RqNwdGQ4rXfWjh+fgzyiqOtI7yY+9uop9wn669WBuxBGmGoipv3rjM7esnAZZz4Y6xahN6xLpTTuwf/AnpUSRDgJUccgJ7Oqg6E/zDoYEpYV9Z4JIOuyueYDTQDhqiJ1I1iyCrUo1Oc0tjCe60fbreMKZbsJ+x8ioZ1llYUoIvsML1qXI0ipDA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 08 Oct 2020 02:11:11 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9F3CF2315633; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:11:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 22:11:10 -0400
Message-Id: <20201008021110.9F3CF2315633@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
Cc: moore@network-heretics.com
In-Reply-To: <2d497f5a-6daf-617f-648e-29f91cdbd464@network-heretics.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/wCTFMaAQ9QZKMJWfT-YmHC8D0GY>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 02:11:16 -0000

In article <2d497f5a-6daf-617f-648e-29f91cdbd464@network-heretics.com> you write:
>- I wonder if it makes sense to have a way for the subject message to 
>provide a set of reaction choices recommended for use by a recipient in 
>composing a reply.   Such a facility could be used, for example, by a 
>mailing list to request specific responses,  or even for voting.  
>Presumably a separate header field would be used in the subject message 
>to specify choices, e.g.:
>
>reply-react-choices = "Reply-React-Choices:" ("single" / "multiple") ";" 
>lwsp react-choice *("," lwsp react-choice)

I don't think it's a great idea to go down this particular rathole.

If you want to send people a multiple choice response form, the way to
do it these days to send a MIME HTML message body that contains a web
form. Reinventing this wheel doesn't seem very useful.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email