IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: a letter

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 22 March 1996 20:19 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25206; 22 Mar 96 15:19 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25202; 22 Mar 96 15:18 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06613; 22 Mar 96 15:18 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25184; 22 Mar 96 15:18 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25176; 22 Mar 96 15:18 EST
Received: from [171.69.128.114] (fred-mac-fr.cisco.com [171.69.128.114]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id MAA19130; Fri, 22 Mar 1996 12:18:30 -0800
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v02140b53ad78b974e611@[171.69.128.114]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 12:18:33 -0800
To: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: a letter
Cc: iesg@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US

At 1:32 PM 3/22/96, Steve Coya wrote:
>Not a thing. These are essentially the same issue. We're in a race
>with Mobileip and RFC1602bis.

my take for the moment is to operate on the "bis" rules.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
It has recently been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email