IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Your Appeal to me regarding replacing IPSEC WG Chair(s)

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 19 March 1996 19:02 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19883; 19 Mar 96 14:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19879; 19 Mar 96 14:02 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10548; 19 Mar 96 14:02 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19871; 19 Mar 96 14:02 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19867; 19 Mar 96 14:02 EST
Received: from [171.69.128.114] (fred-mac-fr.cisco.com [171.69.128.114]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA17014; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:02:04 -0800
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v02140b5cad74afaf174d@[171.69.128.114]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:02:07 -0800
To: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Your Appeal to me regarding replacing IPSEC WG Chair(s)
Cc: iesg@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US, ipsec@tis.com

At 1:27 PM 3/19/96, Scott Bradner wrote:
>I would claim that we have not received an appeal from Bill.

Would you suggest, then, that we sit tight and wait (which is most likely
to result in Bill doing nothing, and then taking some more public forum to
say that we have not responded to his appeal, whereupon we point to the
text and say that we're waiting to receive one) or that I drop him a note
that says "please forward a 1602bis compliant appeal"?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
It has recently been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email