IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Your Appeal to me regarding replacing IPSEC WG Chair(s)

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 19 March 1996 19:10 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20168; 19 Mar 96 14:10 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20164; 19 Mar 96 14:10 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10701; 19 Mar 96 14:10 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20156; 19 Mar 96 14:10 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20152; 19 Mar 96 14:10 EST
Received: from [171.69.128.114] (fred-mac-fr.cisco.com [171.69.128.114]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA18128; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:10:19 -0800
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v02140b5fad74b5ea8e00@[171.69.128.114]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:10:22 -0800
To: ipsec@tis.com
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Your Appeal to me regarding replacing IPSEC WG Chair(s)
Cc: iesg@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US

It has been pointed out to me that I mis-edited the CC line, and the
preceeding discussion has therefore not been among the IESG. You will, I
trust, forgive the error, which is mine.

Having said which, the statements made are true: Jeff's comments to Bill do
in fact represent the current consensus of the IESG. And, Bill has not made
a formal further appeal in the sense described by RFC 1602bis.

My suggestion is that if Bill would like to make such an appeal, he should
refer to the draft and make a formal appeal, and we will consider it.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
It has recently been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email