IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Your Appeal to me regarding replacing IPSEC WG Chair(s)

Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> Tue, 19 March 1996 19:00 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19828; 19 Mar 96 14:00 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19813; 19 Mar 96 14:00 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10509; 19 Mar 96 14:00 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19726; 19 Mar 96 14:00 EST
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19693; 19 Mar 96 14:00 EST
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9-MT2.02) id NAA11381; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 13:27:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 13:27:25 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <199603191827.NAA11381@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: fred@cisco.com, iesg@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Your Appeal to me regarding replacing IPSEC WG Chair(s)
Cc: ipsec@tis.com

Fred,
	I would claim that we have not received an appeal from Bill.

	The question of the clarity of an appeal cam eup during the
discussion over Dave Perkin's SMI process.  1602bis says that

---
   All appeals must include a detailed and specific description of the
   facts of the dispute. 
---

I claim we have not received a specific message from Bill that meets
anything like these requirements.  I ask that we 
	1/ wait for a specific detailed message
	or
	2/ tell Bill that he should create such a letter then wait

I talked to Bill in LA about appeals & the need to be clear and request
specific actions - so he has heard this message

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email