IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim@kitterman.com> Mon, 10 April 2023 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD7EC151527 for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b="L+sNXuh4"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b="cbNV1qGS"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HnzNMjgXmvLp for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64AC0C14CE2B for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B810F802FE; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:32:54 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1681155159; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=CytNqUjGL1PElyA9zqu4AZtB7yjlLxGVxc/D9eVl1uQ=; b=L+sNXuh4+2O/kKKjmWZRvGH7Sd6HuZiZSeCTUpmGLq4/CGeRKNeDx8GXcnS6EI9fn0qoh mmQ2TIYmOGtR9nbDg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1681155159; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=CytNqUjGL1PElyA9zqu4AZtB7yjlLxGVxc/D9eVl1uQ=; b=cbNV1qGSVqJaoqdrsmJ35fLvMhAA6GawHnYCd1Pax+cLSb0WCnTLo2AHiW5CrhlF8uN6r MzAYP+zQiaxIELqk2CU1XKoP+64nuPH1kfvjwFjJFSRqkXUuxnWzkI1wnDe/GYL/hboGuP+ r+ePlOC0Pv+IsZgZLUZWzIbBLWowel7/otF5nnYqhBLXWWKI2R1RC1/AwaFXmt+/xCwr57b XteNabInbiwPUhbhFUFetZOKkxPaDwRU2ACvVZ1IfI5jAZQabwfkPy/4i1nCAfaEYqo4EwV N0qPE+Bi5EH+tPtKHVvFkfRSH5TIOSE5fVgJ+iSt8QuvPq8h1cC7CdnnHnag==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D862DF80120; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:32:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:32:34 +0000
From: Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim@kitterman.com>
To: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <D3AEDD9B-B968-4E5D-81F5-A4A404415454@wordtothewise.com>
References: <3F462863-515C-4E32-ACED-84180F73ED5A@wordtothewise.com> <2473844.BvYGPQTeIX@localhost> <CAL0qLwa_eM1UUYQwLMAkR8WdfW5oTn=7x6RrbLsOtgHuvO_mzA@mail.gmail.com> <D3AEDD9B-B968-4E5D-81F5-A4A404415454@wordtothewise.com>
Message-ID: <6D667794-1299-446C-A933-44D794E3B64E@kitterman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/ayRXp37wLKo6aPvnihmecZKZMw0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:21:19 -0700
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:33:11 -0000


On April 10, 2023 7:16:41 PM UTC, Laura Atkins <laura@wordtothewise.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 10 Apr 2023, at 19:38, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim@kitterman.com <mailto:ietf-dkim@kitterman.com>> wrote:
>>> On Monday, April 10, 2023 2:05:28 PM EDT Laura Atkins wrote:
>>> ...
>>> > There is currently an active Call for Adoption for a draft.
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> What's the plan for closing this out?  I haven't seen any objections to the 
>>> idea and as of tomorrow it will have been over a week since the formal call 
>>> for adoption.  This happens rarely enough in my experience that I don't recall 
>>> how long these normally run.
>> 
>> Usually a week or two.  The original post wasn't specific, so at this point I think the chairs could call consensus at their discretion unless someone wants to argue it should stay open longer.
>> 
>> The datatracker normally asks what the CFA duration is, but in the "History" tab for this document it doesn't look like one was recorded.  Might be something for the tools team to look at.
>
>I set it for 3 weeks when I set it up in the datatracker.
>
>I think it’s worthwhile to give folks a chance to weigh in. 

Thanks.  It wasn't clear to me what the duration of the call is.  I'm less interested in when it ends than that the end date be defined and known to the working group.


Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email