IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 10 April 2023 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6014CC15152C for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id St8H-Cjefx4b for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95601C14CE3F for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id sg7so25983445ejc.9 for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681152565; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Me4RDUxyqO/IcguVP7nusd53NjGKh7dYZCGoorW6AoY=; b=RJM0Qy3dAtVIeLwSjFgmXHY548EJQRIMZYmUwNcvZq4dDcZUAx83zGucNlCagdevz7 Dp0jfG2o/AYg8FSgSOO/FHq36Jh6NrfrJh/25Y+tNXxYPGfdgVyCMttHVNJ3DPpGnbQe A3UWGHTNDkYw3P5c4CWlHG7pJA38ehg/NXYfay1KvtH1ocgZ97NBYABViWp8AHe9jK8u H+DENxoelytw+QWrxh1K8F7m2In/QpJw3/T1EBTtLr9Nyf4/PTlIxl2Fu4pslmaVvSvO VPYIAFvsFlLdWZR4hPiZK7AzHi61VPtmNg49qDKNPs+XEw9WwGEQn+qt9WazxFq8LEbV HCqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681152565; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Me4RDUxyqO/IcguVP7nusd53NjGKh7dYZCGoorW6AoY=; b=u+zuxPMecSrkb1J4QxiUZjrKQsZtDSex8rdKBhUD+6nNenOTHkacfQOXokT4W/JyZy ySQitryybk3y7dldam2ttQUvxGavJ0wHAu6h1i3UpnlkwkPSxfz1oAE164jL14ooWxnI 6MK4gdSnSA2XmPyIvU6MbFF/TRSWsyvv32n1ed6rHnVu6dXJwQFVXa+SFS7HR5YKMOhf +iaMrBdt7lQ5T6M52Dha+Yq+VVRxJwogvrB52MNQ8BofpCn3B7iw/w32WYOPJOPhT9uv F0Bi3fdZ1UQsAqK7UYj57QxEq77XZsEFvZBia90lyKOMjZI0fcfabwdba/DvBRRaz5pe PyEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fgqKm5Owaj9ZwfCtl+e19nnzgw1JuC8+wCbdAEwGm3azL+bCwL HeDU/oWpjQWUNMiDSJ50tABHB688hPj50DyVle6Y/QOF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350a1HIfIYwKNNP84OqiJSSQSgE9nHolXLZtAdSifNa5XwY7RgLsfEKjwAKHYIwOJ+OOxJ8u3Ps2EYgLeoBs2SQM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6e93:b0:94a:98a1:75d3 with SMTP id sh19-20020a1709076e9300b0094a98a175d3mr1654937ejc.12.1681152564821; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3F462863-515C-4E32-ACED-84180F73ED5A@wordtothewise.com> <2473844.BvYGPQTeIX@localhost> <CAL0qLwa_eM1UUYQwLMAkR8WdfW5oTn=7x6RrbLsOtgHuvO_mzA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+FYc3EgmVL08TBWd=xtX4bbd4SQQtf3Qrj78SCcCW+9aA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+FYc3EgmVL08TBWd=xtX4bbd4SQQtf3Qrj78SCcCW+9aA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 14:49:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+Ffrb3QJtLZpe=zyYTShw-Thy5JD3JNbtHmEa16vtUERg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim@kitterman.com>, ietf-dkim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000070824105f8ffd5ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/bl2PgWWHDqWnoorjSO8p6Dk9Eg8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:17:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 18:49:31 -0000

My suggestion - and always happy to be overruled - is close the call Friday
the 14th which will be 10 days.

I feel it seems best to be patient. Also, does it make sense for the chairs
to summarize the comments made during
the call?  We could do this (and by "we" I mean "me", if Laura would double
check my work)

tim

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:42 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> When chairs trigger a state change, you can set "Expected weeks in state"
> but it is usually left blank.
>
> Tim
> Has pushed all the datatracker buttons
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:40 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim@kitterman.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, April 10, 2023 2:05:28 PM EDT Laura Atkins wrote:
>>> ...
>>> > There is currently an active Call for Adoption for a draft.
>>> ...
>>>
>>> What's the plan for closing this out?  I haven't seen any objections to
>>> the
>>> idea and as of tomorrow it will have been over a week since the formal
>>> call
>>> for adoption.  This happens rarely enough in my experience that I don't
>>> recall
>>> how long these normally run.
>>>
>>
>> Usually a week or two.  The original post wasn't specific, so at this
>> point I think the chairs could call consensus at their discretion unless
>> someone wants to argue it should stay open longer.
>>
>> The datatracker normally asks what the CFA duration is, but in the
>> "History" tab for this document it doesn't look like one was recorded.
>> Might be something for the tools team to look at.
>>
>> -MSK
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-dkim mailing list
>> Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email