Re: [Ietf-hub-boston] Future meeting schedule

[Kyle Rose <[e-mail]>]

I agree, mostly because I think we benefit greatly from informal
discussion. The hour and a half we spent talking about the IETF leadership
at the last meeting was eye-opening, and IMO would have been even better
with more folks in attendance sharing their perspectives.


On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:03 AM Ted Lemon <[e-mail]> wrote:

> It might be good to answer the question ”why are we meeting“ first.
> Otherwise it’s hard to know if this is the right amount.
>
> For my part, I’m actually more interested in low effort frequent meetings
> that not everyone gets to than high effort infrequent meetings that.. not
> everyone gets to. I’m not claiming that’s right, just sharing my
> impression.
>
> On Nov 4, 2019, at 15:37, Andrew G. Malis <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> 
> Dale,
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:18 PM Dale R. Worley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> What with the IETF meeting nearly upon us, it's a little early to
>> schedule the next Hub meeting.  But I've been thinking of principles to
>> get a regular meeting cycle going.  So far, I've come up with:
>>
>> - three meetings a year, equidistant from the IETF meetings, i.e.,
>>   mid-January, mid-May, and Mid-September  (Probably put the mid-Jan
>>   meeting *after* MLK Day.)
>>
>> - rotating among the three high-tech zones in metro Boston:  Kendall
>>   Square, Route 128 NW, and Route 495 NW (Are there other zones I've
>>   missed?)
>>
>> - rotating among the three days of the week that seem to be the easiest
>>   for people:  Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday
>>
>> The rotations help prevent people from being locked out if they have a
>> rigid commitment on a particular day of the week, or find one of the
>> zones inaccessible.
>>
>> I think it's also important to get the dates of the meetings fixed well
>> in advance, as people can then construct the rest of their calendar
>> around the Hub meeting, rather than trying to put the Hub meeting among
>> scheduled things.  People seem better at dynamically adjusting where
>> they commute to than dynamically adjusting when events are.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-hub-boston mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-boston
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-hub-boston mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-boston
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-hub-boston mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hub-boston
>