[Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt
"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Tue, 06 November 2007 17:56 UTC
Return-path: <ietf-message-headers-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpSer-0000By-9n; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:56:13 -0500
Received: from ietf-message-headers by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IpSeq-0000BB-FR for ietf-message-headers-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:56:12 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpSeq-00008V-3J for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:56:12 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpSen-0002aN-9e for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:56:12 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IpSeD-0003ej-33 for ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:55:33 +0000
Received: from c-134-89-5.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.134.89.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:55:33 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-134-89-5.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:55:33 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf-message-headers@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:50:32 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <fgq9pj$ksq$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <47308BA7.3080204@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-134-89-5.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." <ietf-message-headers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-message-headers-bounces@ietf.org
Peter Saint-Andre wrote on the message-headers list: > FYI Thanks. Frankly, I hate these drafts. 1 - why two drafts instead of one ? 2 - who wants to publish pres URIs in email headers ? 3 - what about Netnews ? 4 - what's going on with the nice jabberid draft ? 5 - jabberid had an interesting IRI example, the new drafts claim that juliet@example.com is an URI. 6 - I've never seen a pres: URI outside of RFC 3859, why should I wish to see this in a mail header ? 7 - the jabberid was obviously about xmpp:, what are im: and pres: about ? 8 - RFC 3859 still uses RFC 2396 syntax on top of a RFC 2822 <mailbox>. That's known to be wrong if I recall discussions with Paul and Martin on the URI list about RFC 2368 (mailto) correctly. 9 - Likewise RFC 3860. I hope you're not trying to move vCards piecemeal into mail header fields. Frank Cc: general list, after all jabberid was Last Called. _______________________________________________ Ietf-message-headers mailing list Ietf-message-headers@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers
- [Ietf-message-headers] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-sai… Peter Saint-Andre
- [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sainta… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Peter Saint-Andre
- [Ietf-message-headers] Re: Re:I-DAction:draft-sai… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: Re:I-DAction:draft… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… SM
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Peter Saint-Andre
- [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sainta… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… SM
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Sam Hartman
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-sa… Cullen Jennings
- [Ietf-message-headers] draft-saintandre-header-pr… Bruce Lilly
- [Ietf-message-headers] Re: draft-saintandre-heade… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: draft-saintandre-h… Bruce Lilly
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: draft-saintandre-h… Peter Saint-Andre
- [Ietf-message-headers] Re: draft-saintandre-heade… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: draft-saintandre-h… Peter Saint-Andre
- [Ietf-message-headers] Re: draft-saintandre-heade… Frank Ellermann