IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] mailing lists are complicated, was Email explained from first principles

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 30 May 2021 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2013A3EDA for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A_WjmVBT8xaR for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626943A3EDB for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 07:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1622386768; bh=uaOVoFai+mHzRk/RYC3l6ncCIZz91K8PFnFgOh9TRGE=; l=402; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CjVd0D5fAisNj1JH6iuFLHIb2Rf5hQS7EHd2NxIHZEhS3QdiSUGZg340umjGAFph1 cBSvCjOlsaDBj3dYJIg/PtfNxAvwGLyowVMmmSIl0Us7zAstB+FVaF4UY2DrQc4H+G uZYeKdRMK+uAsv2YUgeQNmLL4WwfCL3c2ZQ9iGlUy2FhbOMndrvNeax2av0i9
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (host-87-4-152-162.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.4.152.162]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC03D.0000000060B3A850.000026FE; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:59:28 +0200
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <20210528181821.943B08E0563@ary.qy> <d60c6034-bab1-2346-394d-e41312a46222@tana.it> <b6936b7c-2898-e013-4ffe-af52bc1efedd@taugh.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <46b3f39d-e87a-4bba-df63-5652a86d0ac8@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 16:59:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b6936b7c-2898-e013-4ffe-af52bc1efedd@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/9tOp6_XwG8Q1UDFkMVu6tfwV_mM>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] mailing lists are complicated, was Email explained from first principles
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 14:59:42 -0000

On Sat 29/May/2021 16:23:22 +0200 John Levine wrote:> On Sat, 29 May 
2021, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> 
>> I see no conflict between these two methods.
> 
> Just wondering, but has anyone implemented the mutant DKIM you are 
> proposing?


I added that to zdkimfilter.


>  Is there a spec or an I-D?


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vesely-dmarc-mlm-transform/


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email