Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement?
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 14 September 2020 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDC33A0EC7 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4htiu4Tzu_ik for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0423A0EC3 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.107] (c-24-130-63-26.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.63.26]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 08EJWxoT016904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:32:59 -0700
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>, iloveemail2 <iloveemail2@protonmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-smtp@ietf.org" <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
References: <te1SaFZOMSOjDAcEAvL24CF40exooXRe212SQoZQMoBX8BJyFGmg2KYVr5VTPxH3G5G7myxRvAfLZ7Q_Ok3MRVRlH48GHddeOLSgkpWIMKE=@protonmail.com> <CABa8R6tt6pCEJ642JmcZE6Xgc+8ziGJOPzOsX0qTiDBbR-FWFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <27a93330-b4bd-c631-75c9-09425536ac28@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:29:53 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6tt6pCEJ642JmcZE6Xgc+8ziGJOPzOsX0qTiDBbR-FWFg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/sdvUZW7LKFj_m9y45VJ803Lhj1g>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement?
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:30:11 -0000
On 8/14/2020 3:21 PM, Brandon Long wrote: > What problems are you trying to solve with these? Indeed. Proposals should always provide a clear and compelling (or at least strong) statement of need, which divides into a statement of what the problem or opportunity is and a statement of community support for doing something about it. The latter might not be readily available, but its essential before making progress. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? iloveemail2
- Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? iloveemail2
- Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp improvement? John Bucy